Re: bgp local preference

Joe,

Your credibility should not be at stake. You have helped plenty of people on
this forum with your knowledge. I was not attacking, I was defending.

I'm sure you did not mean that a person was a piece of garbage. Based on
your response, I think you wanted to say that the act of cheating is
garbage...right?

Next time I will unicast my feelings and hold the Group Post for facts.

Apologies to EVERYONE!!!

Paul

-- 
Paul Negron
CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
Senior Technical Instructor
> From: Joe Astorino <joeastorino1982_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:23:13 -0400
> To: Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>, nitin shettigar
> <nitinbizzy_at_gmail.com>, Carlos Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>, Brian Dennis
> <bdennis_at_ine.com>, <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: bgp local preference
> 
> Is this a joke? Everybody is thinking the same thing, I'm just saying
> it. You know what sets me off? Cheaters. Not sure why you are so upset
> and why you feel the need to personally attack me for sharing my
> opinion. It is pretty unbelievable that you can find time for this but
> not to say anything at all about a clear NDA violation on the list.
> Yeah, let's all just let that go and be nice. Guess what? I don't work
> for a training vendor here and I am not forced to be nice.
> 
> Also, yeah I did not see the solution at first (and with all due
> respect not all the facts were given). It happens and I admit when I
> am wrong or missed something. What does that have to do with calling
> this guy out for cheating? Oh wait, NOTHING. You are calling me out on
> list because you don't like my opinion...how is this at all different
> than what you are whining about?
> 
>  You are welcome to disagree with my opinion and comments and I
> respect your right to do whatever you want to do, but please don't sit
> here and attack my credibility because you are upset.
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/13/12, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> This coming from the guy who said.
>> 
>> " Local preference is an attribute local to an AS so doing this without
>> touching AS 200 would be IMPOSSIBLE."
>> 
>> YUP. Real Class Act.
>> 
>> Unicast it next time !! Tough Guy!!!
>> 
>> 
>> Sorry Marko, Brian....that comment set me off. I'll unicast it next time!
>> 
>> Paul
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Paul Negron
>> CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
>> Senior Technical Instructor
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Joe Astorino <joeastorino1982_at_gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:12:23 -0400
>>> To: nitin shettigar <nitinbizzy_at_gmail.com>, Carlos Mendioroz
>>> <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>, Brian Dennis
>>> <bdennis_at_ine.com>, <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>> Subject: Re: bgp local preference
>>> 
>>> Hi Nittin,
>>> 
>>> You are a real piece of garbage. Here is a concept - study and learn
>>> instead of cheating. What an epiphany!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/13/12, nitin shettigar <nitinbizzy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I had this issue in the CCIE tshoot exam.
>>>> So will the above solution valid for tshoot??
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you Markov and Denis for your efforts..
>>>> 
>>>> - Nitin
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Carlos Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Why. not?
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Carlos Mendioroz <tron_at_acm.org>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original message-----
>>>>> 
>>>>> *From: *nitin shettigar <nitinbizzy_at_gmail.com>*
>>>>> To: *Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>*
>>>>> Cc: *Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>, Brian Dennis
>>>>> <bdennis_at_ine.com>,
>>>>> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com*
>>>>> Sent: *Tue, 13 Mar 2012, 15:48:03 GMT+00:00
>>>>> *
>>>>> Subject: *Re: bgp local preference
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is the solution provided applicable in CCIE exam??
>>>>> 
>>>>>  - Nitin
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz
>>>>> <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> but the other is ? :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Actually, both have to be configured for confederation, right ?
>>>>>> Also, it might be the case that AS100 has a route-map with some
>>>>>> logic that sets LP based on preset communities, so you just have to
>>>>>> figure out which is the community you have to set, and enable it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Carlos
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Paul Negron @ 13/03/2012 03:14 -0300 dixit:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  That's the only way I could think of this. But you would have to
>>>>>> assume
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> other router was configured as a confederation already.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> He did not state that but I was not sure if it was a challenge or if
>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>> really wanted to know how.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Kind of like the riddle..... you have to make 2 coins that equal 30
>>>>>>> cents.
>>>>>>> One of them is not a Quarter.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>>>>> ___________
>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/**
>>>>>> list/CCIELab.html <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Joe Astorino
>>> CCIE #24347
>>> http://astorinonetworks.com
>>> 
>>> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent from my mobile device
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Joe Astorino
> CCIE #24347
> http://astorinonetworks.com
> 
> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net