Re: Version 4 Question

Static-RP.
NOTE: Bidirectional is no longer there, they used to mention it but
recently it has been removed, just like RIPng, they keep adding it and then
removing it.

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> wrote:

> I'd vote static RP. As it's the only thing that makes sense in the
> context of the line it's in. *shrug*
>
> HTH,
>
>
>
>
> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>
> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>
> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>
> evil_at_ine.com
>
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
>
>
>
> Nathan Richie wrote:
> > Under Section 5 of the R&S version 4 lab blueprint, it reads:
> >
> > 5.40 - Implement PIM Auto-Rendezvous Point (Auto-RP), unicast rendezvous
> point (RP), and bootstrap router (BSR)
> >
> > Does the unicast rendezvous point (RP) refer to static RP or is this
> another misprint and should be unicast RPF or Anycast RP? (By misprint, I
> am referring to the "1.10(C) - 801.1s " for STP.
> >
> > Just trying to clarify.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nathan
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
*Narbik Kocharians
*CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
*www.MicronicsTraining.com* <http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
Sr. Technical Instructor
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training & Remote Racks available
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net