Re: redistribution help

R5#debug ip routing
IP routing debugging is on
R5#
*Jan 2 20:34:17.206: RT: closer admin distance for 135.15.103.0, flushing
1 routes
*Jan 2 20:34:17.206: RT: NET-RED 135.15.103.0/24
*Jan 2 20:34:17.210: RT: add 135.15.103.0/24 via 135.15.10.4, ospf metric
[110/20]
*Jan 2 20:34:17.210: RT: NET-RED 135.15.103.0/24
*Jan 2 20:34:24.202: RT: del 135.15.103.0/24 via 135.15.10.4, ospf metric
[110/20]
*Jan 2 20:34:24.202: RT: delete subnet route to 135.15.103.0/24
*Jan 2 20:34:24.206: RT: NET-RED 135.15.103.0/24
*Jan 2 20:34:32.166: RT: add 135.15.103.0/24 via 135.15.35.3, rip metric
[120/1]
*Jan 2 20:34:32.166: RT: NET-RED 135.15.103.0/24
*Jan 2 20:34:36.174: RT: closer admin distance for 135.15.103.0, flushing
1 routes
*Jan 2 20:34:36.178: RT: NET-RED 135.15.103.0/24
*Jan 2 20:34:36.178: RT: add 135.15.103.0/24 via 135.15.10.4, ospf metric
[110/20]
*Jan 2 20:34:36.178: RT: NET-RED 135.15.103.0/24
*Jan 2 20:34:43.182: RT: del 135.15.103.0/24 via 135.15.10.4, ospf metric
[110/20]
*Jan 2 20:34:43.182: RT: delete subnet route to 135.15.103.0/24
*Jan 2 20:34:43.182: RT: NET-RED 135.15.103.0/24
*Jan 2 20:34:48.566: RT: add 135.15.103.0/24 via 135.15.25.2, rip metric
[120/2]
*Jan 2 20:34:48.566: RT: NET-RED 135.15.103.0/24

On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:53 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> !
> router eigrp 162
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 10 255 1 1500 route-map ospf
> redistribute rip metric 10000 10 255 1 1500 route-map rip
> network 135.15.16.1 0.0.0.0
> no auto-summary
> !
> router ospf 1
> log-adjacency-changes
> area 10 virtual-link 135.15.104.1
> redistribute eigrp 162 subnets route-map eigrp
> redistribute rip subnets route-map rip
> network 135.15.12.1 0.0.0.0 area 20
> network 135.15.13.1 0.0.0.0 area 10
> network 135.15.14.1 0.0.0.0 area 10
> neighbor 135.15.12.2
> !
> router rip
> version 2
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 3 route-map ospf
> redistribute eigrp 162 metric 3 route-map eigrp
> passive-interface default
> no passive-interface FastEthernet0/1.50
> network 135.15.0.0
> no auto-summary
> !
> ip forward-protocol nd
> !
> !
> ip http server
> no ip http secure-server
> !
> ip access-list standard eigrp
> permit 135.15.26.0
> permit 135.15.16.0
> permit 135.15.106.0
> ip access-list standard ospf
> permit 135.15.10.0
> permit 135.15.34.0
> ip access-list standard rip
> permit 135.15.25.0
> permit 135.15.20.0
> permit 135.15.23.0
> permit 135.15.35.0
> permit 135.15.105.0
> permit 135.15.102.0
> permit 135.15.103.0
> !
> !
> !
> !
> route-map ospf permit 10
> match ip address ospf
> !
> route-map eigrp permit 10
> match ip address eigrp
> !
> route-map rip permit 10
> match ip address rip
> !
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:40 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Evening/Morning/Salutations Experts:
>>
>> I am quickly ending my game performing some mutual redistribution of
>> eigrp<->ospf, eigrp<->rip, rip<->ospf. I attempted to reduce redistributed
>> routes with route-maps that reference an access list that permits routes
>> from the IGP.
>>
>> ex:
>>
>> !
>> router eigrp 162
>> redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 10 255 1 1500 route-map ospf
>> network 135.15.16.1 0.0.0.0
>> no auto-summary
>> !
>> router ospf 1
>> log-adjacency-changes
>> area 10 virtual-link 135.15.104.1
>> redistribute eigrp 162 subnets route-map eigrp
>> redistribute rip subnets route-map rip
>> network 135.15.12.1 0.0.0.0 area 20
>> network 135.15.13.1 0.0.0.0 area 10
>> network 135.15.14.1 0.0.0.0 area 10
>> neighbor 135.15.12.2
>> !
>> router rip
>> version 2
>> redistribute ospf 1 metric 3 route-map ospf
>> redistribute eigrp 162 metric 3 route-map eigrp
>> passive-interface default
>> no passive-interface FastEthernet0/1.50
>> network 135.15.0.0
>> no auto-summary
>> !
>> ip forward-protocol nd
>> !
>> !
>> ip http server
>> no ip http secure-server
>> !
>> ip access-list standard eigrp
>> permit 135.15.26.0
>> permit 135.15.16.0
>> permit 135.15.106.0
>> ip access-list standard ospf
>> permit 3.3.3.0
>> permit 111.1.1.1
>> permit 135.15.10.0
>> permit 135.15.12.0
>> permit 135.15.13.0
>> permit 135.15.14.0
>> permit 135.15.34.0
>> ip access-list standard rip
>> permit 135.15.25.0
>> permit 135.15.20.0
>> permit 135.15.23.0
>> permit 135.15.35.0
>> permit 135.15.105.0
>> permit 135.15.102.0
>> permit 135.15.103.0
>> !
>>
>> Got forked up somewhere and do not see all routes from farthest neighbor
>> r5. This is currently the first and only router I have
>> performed redistribution on.
>>
>> *Jan 16 07:39:18.030: RT: add 135.15.20.0/24 via 135.15.21.2, rip metric
>> [120/2]
>> *Jan 16 07:39:18.030: RT: NET-RED 135.15.20.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:18.030: RT: add 135.15.35.0/24 via 135.15.21.2, rip metric
>> [120/2]
>> *Jan 16 07:39:18.030: RT: NET-RED 135.15.35.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:18.034: RT: add 135.15.105.0/24 via 135.15.21.2, rip
>> metric [120/2]
>> *Jan 16 07:39:18.034: RT: NET-RED 135.15.105.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:20.058: RT: del 135.15.20.0/24 via 135.15.21.2, rip metric
>> [120/2]
>> *Jan 16 07:39:20.058: RT: delete subnet route to 135.15.20.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:20.058: RT: NET-RED 135.15.20.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:20.058: RT: del 135.15.35.0/24 via 135.15.21.2, rip metric
>> [120/2]
>> *Jan 16 07:39:20.058: RT: delete subnet route to 135.15.35.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:20.058: RT: NET-RED 135.15.35.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:20.062: RT: del 135.15.105.0/24 via 135.15.21.2, rip
>> metric [120/2]
>> *Jan 16 07:39:20.062: RT: delete subnet route to 135.15.105.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:20.062: RT: NET-RED 135.15.105.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:22.866: RT: add 135.15.103.0/24 via 135.15.21.2, rip
>> metric [120/2]
>> *Jan 16 07:39:22.866: RT: NET-RED 135.15.103.0/24
>> *Jan 16 07:39:24.894: RT: del 135.15.103.0/24 via 135.15.21.2, rip
>> metric [120/2]
>> *Jan 16 07:39:24.894: RT: delete subnet route to 135.15.103.0/24
>>
>> please advise...
>>
>> Marc

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jan 15 2012 - 15:02:07 ART