Re: MPLS LABEL

And if you don't know the answer, just how can you determine whether the
VS tag will apply prior to asking?

How about tagging responses like that as VI for very irritating? *shrug*

Perfectly valid question and simple enough to answer. Could they have
tested it on their own? Sure, just set the label range to have like 10
labels and there's less config before running into the problem. :)

But they asked. In case you haven't noticed, there's a LOT of that
which occurs, and yet the questions are answered. I could select your
question about EUI-64 for serial interfaces back in September as a
potential example there.

Relax a little! </rant>

*Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

CCDE #2009::D, CCNP-Voice, JNCIE-SP #153, JNCIE-ER #102, CISSP, et al.

CCSI #21903, JNCI-SP, JNCI-ER

swm_at_emanon.com

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

On 1/15/12 10:37 AM, Imran Ali wrote:
>> Apologies in advance for a very silly question but I am stuck so need an
>> answer.
>>
> Dont mind but please tag the subject line as VS very silly before posting
> such questions
>
>
>
>> What If I a PE router configured for a label range say 200 299. I have only
>> 100 label and if I have 500 routes in that network, how does this MPLS
>> label work ?
>>
>> MPLS label is assigned to each route . I created a own lab to learn MPLS
>> and I am now stuck at this. I will add some loopbacks and see how it works
>> and will reduce the label range to say 20 and will add some 30 loop back
>> but if someone can explain me so that I can see them in action.
>>
>>
>> R3#show mpls forwarding-table
>> Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes Label Outgoing Next Hop
>> Label Label or Tunnel Id Switched interface
>> 300 Pop Label 2.2.2.2/32 0 Et0/0 10.1.23.2
>> 301 201 4.4.4.4/32 0 Et0/0 10.1.23.2
>> 302 Pop Label 10.1.24.0/24 0 Et0/0 10.1.23.2
>> 303 No Label 1.1.0.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 305 No Label 1.1.1.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 306 No Label 1.1.2.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 307 No Label 1.1.3.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 308 No Label 1.1.4.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 309 No Label 1.1.5.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 310 No Label 1.1.6.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 311 No Label 1.1.7.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 312 No Label 1.1.8.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 313 No Label 1.1.9.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 314 No Label 1.1.10.1/32[V] 0 Se1/1
>> point2point
>> 315 No Label 10.1.13.0/24[V] 520 aggregate/CA
>> 316 No Label 192.168.1.0/24[V] \
>> 0 Se1/1 point2point
>>
>> Thanking you kindly in advance.
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jan 15 2012 - 10:45:02 ART