have you explicitly defined next hops for the tunnel ?
such as
ip explicit-path name abc
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Routing Freak <routingfreak_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi fellas,
>
> I found something with respect to MPLS Traffic Engineering working with
> EIGRP. I just tried out EIGRP as my IGP in the core and formed a tunnel
> between two PE and made changes with respect to IGP flow of traffic. and
> found TE tunnel working like a charm.
> Can someone say how this is posssible.
> I just used a keyword VERBATIM after the path option under the tunnel
> interface.
>
> Can someone tell me the logic of how TE utilize the database of the end to
> end tunnel without having the complete view of the topology.
>
> Because EIGRP works with Routing by rumor. So how could this happen with
> Traffic Engineering where OSPF n ISIS provides necessary LSA's and extended
> TLV's to convey the bandwidth information.
>
> can anyone explain me the logic of this VERBATIM command in the path
> option?
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Dec 18 2011 - 20:51:51 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 01 2012 - 08:27:00 ART