Re: MPLS TE with EIGRP is now possible

Hi Imran,

Yes man i did it with explicit route object with a different route when
compared to IGP following path.

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Imran Ali <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> have you explicitly defined next hops for the tunnel ?
>
> such as
>
> ip explicit-path name abc
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Routing Freak <routingfreak_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi fellas,
>>
>> I found something with respect to MPLS Traffic Engineering working with
>> EIGRP. I just tried out EIGRP as my IGP in the core and formed a tunnel
>> between two PE and made changes with respect to IGP flow of traffic. and
>> found TE tunnel working like a charm.
>> Can someone say how this is posssible.
>> I just used a keyword VERBATIM after the path option under the tunnel
>> interface.
>>
>> Can someone tell me the logic of how TE utilize the database of the end to
>> end tunnel without having the complete view of the topology.
>>
>> Because EIGRP works with Routing by rumor. So how could this happen with
>> Traffic Engineering where OSPF n ISIS provides necessary LSA's and
>> extended
>> TLV's to convey the bandwidth information.
>>
>> can anyone explain me the logic of this VERBATIM command in the path
>> option?
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Dec 18 2011 - 23:49:16 ART