Re: Auto QoS

Adam,

This looks correct. I don't see the common class-map, match protocol rtp
command which is used when you specify the auto qos voip. I'll run the
auto qos voip trust to meet the requirements specified.

Nice.. Thank you. Adam. and Garry.

Joe Sanchez

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Adam Booth <adam.booth_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Joe,
>
> Here's an example that doesn't use NBAR - I think the important part is to
> include the "voip" keyword when you specify using auto qos
>
> We start from here:
>
> R1(config)#do sh run int s0/1
> interface Serial0/1
> bandwidth 512
> ip address 10.1.13.1 255.255.255.0
> end
>
> R1(config-if)#int s0/1
> R1(config-if)#auto qos voip trust
> R1(config-if)#
> *Mar 1 19:10:02.823: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Multilink2001100117,
> changed state to down
> *Mar 1 19:10:03.999: %RMON-5-FALLINGTRAP: Falling trap is generated
> because the value of cbQosCMDropBitRate.162.632273 has fallen below the
> falling-threshold value 0
> *Mar 1 19:10:05.975: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
> Serial0/1, changed state to down
> R1(config-if)#do sh run int s0/1
> Building configuration...
>
> Current configuration : 180 bytes
> !
> interface Serial0/1
> bandwidth 512
> no ip address
> encapsulation ppp
> auto qos voip trust
> no fair-queue
> clock rate 2000000
> ppp multilink
> ppp multilink group 2001100117
> end
> R1(config-if)#do sh auto qos int s0/1
>
> Serial0/1 -
> !
> interface Serial0/1
> no ip address
> encapsulation ppp
> no fair-queue
> ppp multilink
> ppp multilink group 2001100117
> !
> interface Multilink2001100117
> bandwidth 512
> ip address 10.1.13.1 255.255.255.0
> ppp multilink
> ppp multilink interleave
> ppp multilink group 2001100117
> ppp multilink fragment delay 10
> service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust
> ip rtp header-compression iphc-format
> R1(config-if)#do sh policy-map
> Policy Map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust
> Class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
> Strict Priority
> Bandwidth 70 (%)
> Class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
> Bandwidth 5 (%) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
> Class class-default
> Flow based Fair Queueing
> Bandwidth 0 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
>
> R1(config-if)#do sh class-map
> Class Map match-any class-default (id 0)
> Match any
>
> Class Map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust (id 1)
> Match ip dscp ef (46)
>
> Class Map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust (id 2)
> Match ip dscp cs3 (24)
> Match ip dscp af31 (26)
>
> As you can see NBAR is not used in classification here when we use auto
> qos voip trust - if you don't use the trust keyword, the policy-map and
> class-maps will be different but still will not be relying on NBAR - so my
> guess would be you need to use "auto qos voip" rather than "auto qos" on
> its own
>
> Cheers,
> Adam
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:11 AM, George J. Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I have to research this in greater detail, however I do not believe I've
>> ever ran the auto QoS without the discovery command, I could only think of
>> running auto QoS and if it uses the match protocol, I would have to quickly
>> copy, paste, modify and paste back into the config. I however believe
>> there should be a method to run the auto QoS like you mentioned with or
>> without a parameter to accomplish this task.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Joe Sanchez
>>
>> On Nov 19, 2011, at 3:05 AM, Adam Booth <adam.booth_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> I believe that the idea is that you should avoid using "auto discovery
>> qos" because that would use NBAR.
>>
>> How do you believe you should interpret things?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:25 PM, George J. Sanchez <<marco207p_at_gmail.com>
>> marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Let's say that you are required to configure auto QoS between two
>>> routers on a serial interface, but you have to ensure that the routers do
>>> not use protocols to match traffic in the configuration?
>>>
>>> What is the quickest method to accomplish this task?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Joe Sanchez
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at <http://www.ccie.net>http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Nov 19 2011 - 21:06:58 ART