Re: dynamic routing scenario - prefer one path over the other

From: Narottam Prajapati <narottam26_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 22:18:48 +0530

Hi

   1 You can set matrix during redistribution.
   2 ofset-list also helpout.

Regards,
Narottam Prajapati

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote:

> Then, I guess, redistributing into EIGRP 100 with fixed metric (higher
> in the case of R1) is all you need. That will even work for partial
> backup.
>
> -Carlos
>
> marc fernandez @ 8/11/2011 10:57 -0300 dixit:
>
>> All outbound traffic must traverse CE1. R1 thru DMVPN is strictly in case
>> CE1 goes down. The requirement is to get rid of HSRP and implement dynamic
>> routing only (for failover).
>>
>> *From:* Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
>> *To:* marc fernandez <mag08036_at_yahoo.com>
>> *Cc:* "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 8, 2011 8:16 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: dynamic routing scenario - prefer one path over the other
>> after redistribution
>>
>>
>> Hey Marc,
>> why do you have HSRP between CE1 and R1 ?
>> Is it a possible scenario to have some remote sites going through R1 and
>> others via CE1 ? Even when all links are up and runnig ?
>>
>> -Carlos
>>
>> marc fernandez @ 8/11/2011 2:48 -0300 dixit:
>> > Hello Experts,
>> > I have the following scenario.
>> > 1) CE1 connecting to PE1 via
>> > BGP - Primary wan connectivity
>> > 2) IPVPN R1 connection to remote IPVPN
>> > router (DMVPN) EIGRP 200 is used--This is a backup for wan connectivity
>> > 3) CE1
>> > and IPVPN R1 are doing HSRP -----
>> > 4) CE1 and R1 are connecting to a VSS Switch
>> > which is being used as the default gateway for the reast of the local
>> network.
>> > They will all use EIGRP 100 as the routing protocol.
>> > I was thinking of
>> > doing the following:
>> > 1)Redistribute EBGP into EIGRP 100 2)Redistribute
>> > EIGRP 200 into EIGRP 100
>> > Routes from both remote locations would have equal
>> > cost paths (Admin Distance 170)
>> > In order to prefer the CE to PE path I was
>> > thinking of messing around with the delay on the CE router for EIGRP.
>> > Any
>> > thoughts/advise/examples on the best practice to advertise the routes
>> from the
>> > primary as prefered would be greatly appreciated.
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > ______________________________**______________________________**
>> ___________
>> > Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/**
>> list/CCIELab.html <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> -- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar <mailto:tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>> LW7
>> EQI Argentina
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> ______________________________**______________________________**
> ___________
> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/**
> list/CCIELab.html <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Nov 09 2011 - 22:18:48 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 01 2011 - 06:29:31 ART