Re: dynamic routing scenario - prefer one path over the other

From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:16:40 -0300

Hey Marc,
why do you have HSRP between CE1 and R1 ?
Is it a possible scenario to have some remote sites going through R1 and
others via CE1 ? Even when all links are up and runnig ?

-Carlos

marc fernandez @ 8/11/2011 2:48 -0300 dixit:
> Hello Experts,
>
> I have the following scenario.
>
> 1) CE1 connecting to PE1 via
> BGP - Primary wan connectivity
> 2) IPVPN R1 connection to remote IPVPN
> router (DMVPN) EIGRP 200 is used--This is a backup for wan connectivity
> 3) CE1
> and IPVPN R1 are doing HSRP -----
> 4) CE1 and R1 are connecting to a VSS Switch
> which is being used as the default gateway for the reast of the local network.
> They will all use EIGRP 100 as the routing protocol.
>
> I was thinking of
> doing the following:
>
> 1)Redistribute EBGP into EIGRP 100
> 2)Redistribute
> EIGRP 200 into EIGRP 100
>
> Routes from both remote locations would have equal
> cost paths (Admin Distance 170)
> In order to prefer the CE to PE path I was
> thinking of messing around with the delay on the CE router for EIGRP.
>
> Any
> thoughts/advise/examples on the best practice to advertise the routes from the
> primary as prefered would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Nov 08 2011 - 10:16:40 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Dec 01 2011 - 06:29:31 ART