Re: BGP to OSPF Redistribution w/ Sham-Link

*There's nothing really difficult with sham-links, if you follow the
steps for configuration.
*
I agree 1000 percent.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 16:22, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
> wrote:
> > I said that I've just seen a test case where the link does not come
> > up, even with the loopback published in BGP and not in OSPF.
> > So I don't fit in your rule.
>
> ... if you have redistribution from BGP to OSPF, then you are very
> much advertising loopbacks in OSPF, unless you were filtering. If you
> were filtering, then you probably had an entirely different MPLS
> transport issue, which only manifested itself by sham-links not coming
> up.
>
> There's nothing really difficult with sham-links, if you follow the
> steps for configuration.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
 *Narbik Kocharians
*CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
*www.MicronicsTraining.com* <http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
Sr. Technical Instructor
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training & Remote Racks available
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net