I'm sure doing something relly stupid then :)
I've just done it again, below the files to reproduce it.
Just two PEs, serial link and a vrf. I configure it and SL (sham link)
comes up fine. Bounce it and it does not.
This config has some deviations from the standard template, like
area 146 being an NSSA and BGP not being established from loopbacks,
but that should not make a difference, I guess.
-Carlos
Sham.net:
# Demo sham link
[172.30.0.2]
[[7200]]
image = \var\c7200\ios\c7200-advipservicesk9-mz.124-15.T1.bin
npe = npe-400
ram = 160
[[ROUTER PE-Piz]]
console = 2001
s1/0 = F1 1
[[ROUTER PE-Lav]]
console = 2002
s1/0 = F1 2
[[ROUTER CE-Piz]]
console = 2003
f0/0 = PE-Piz f0/0
[[ROUTER CE-Lav]]
console = 2004
f0/0 = PE-Lav f0/0
[[FRSW F1]]
1:102 = 2:201
2:201 = 1:102
-----
PE-Lav:
hostname PE-Lav
!
ip vrf M
rd 100:100
route-target export 100:100
route-target import 100:100
!
interface Loopback100
ip vrf forwarding M
ip address 10.68.146.228 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip vrf forwarding M
ip address 10.68.146.6 255.255.255.252
!
interface Serial1/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
serial restart-delay 0
!
interface Serial1/0.201 point-to-point
ip address 172.16.12.2 255.255.255.252
mpls ip
frame-relay interface-dlci 201
!
router ospf 400 vrf M
log-adjacency-changes
area 146 nssa
area 146 sham-link 10.68.146.228 10.68.146.227 cost 1000
network 10.68.146.4 0.0.0.3 area 146
!
router bgp 100
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 172.16.12.1 remote-as 100
no auto-summary
!
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 172.16.12.1 activate
neighbor 172.16.12.1 send-community extended
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf M
no synchronization
network 10.68.146.228 mask 255.255.255.255
exit-address-family
------
PE-Piz:
hostname PE-Piz
!
ip vrf M
rd 100:100
route-target export 100:100
route-target import 100:100
!
interface Loopback100
ip vrf forwarding M
ip address 10.68.146.227 255.255.255.255
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip vrf forwarding M
ip address 10.68.146.2 255.255.255.252
!
interface Serial1/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay
serial restart-delay 0
!
interface Serial1/0.102 point-to-point
ip address 172.16.12.1 255.255.255.252
mpls ip
frame-relay interface-dlci 102
!
router ospf 400 vrf M
log-adjacency-changes
area 146 nssa
area 146 sham-link 10.68.146.227 10.68.146.228 cost 1000
network 10.68.146.0 0.0.0.3 area 146
!
router bgp 100
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 172.16.12.2 remote-as 100
no auto-summary
!
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 172.16.12.2 activate
neighbor 172.16.12.2 send-community extended
exit-address-family
!
address-family ipv4 vrf M
no synchronization
network 10.68.146.227 mask 255.255.255.255
exit-address-family
------
Narbik Kocharians @ 12/10/2011 02:17 -0300 dixit:
> *There's nothing really difficult with sham-links, if you follow the
> steps for configuration.
> *
> I agree 1000 percent.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 16:22, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
>> wrote:
>>> I said that I've just seen a test case where the link does not come
>>> up, even with the loopback published in BGP and not in OSPF.
>>> So I don't fit in your rule.
>> ... if you have redistribution from BGP to OSPF, then you are very
>> much advertising loopbacks in OSPF, unless you were filtering. If you
>> were filtering, then you probably had an entirely different MPLS
>> transport issue, which only manifested itself by sham-links not coming
>> up.
>>
>> There's nothing really difficult with sham-links, if you follow the
>> steps for configuration.
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Oct 12 2011 - 07:50:36 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 15 2011 - 13:10:29 ART