Re: IPS OR NAC

IPS is more for protecting web-servers and such against direct
attacks. Things like SQL injection attacks, buffer overflows, etc. It
won't help much for malware.

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> What about the IPS ?
>
>
>
>
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:25:10 +1000
> Subject: Re: IPS OR NAC
> From: pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com
> To: go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com; cisco_at_groupstudy.com
>
> What are you trying to protect?
>
> a) server
> or
> b) clients?
>
> for a) --> Use AV or AV+HIDS based solution. not NAC/IPS.
> for b) --> use HIDS+AV
>
> I'd simply protect both with AV solution like Symantec.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have a server in my copmany and all the users access it as Shared Server.
> But unfortunatetly it's infected with virus and worms
> How can i protect my Server ?What is the best solution to protect it ?
> Should i use IPS or NAC ?
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 24 2011 - 08:47:50 ART