Re: IPS OR NAC

These all have different audiance , none of these can protect 100% your
PC/users from attack/virng us.
In anycase, best practice is to put AV on each PC!!
I guess you're trying to save $ear$$ and have only 1 appliance to look after
100+ users!
Unfortunately, tiered protection is a basic building block of security
design and you must have these.

Read on PCI compliant secure networks <_- you will know what I mean.

2011/8/24 Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com>

> What about the IPS ?
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:25:10 +1000
> Subject: Re: IPS OR NAC
> From: pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com
> To: go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com; cisco_at_groupstudy.com
>
>
> What are you trying to protect?
>
> a) server
> or
> b) clients?
>
> for a) --> Use AV or AV+HIDS based solution. not NAC/IPS.
> for b) --> use HIDS+AV
>
> I'd simply protect both with AV solution like Symantec.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Iam Here <go_soon2010_at_hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> I have a server in my copmany and all the users access it as Shared Server.
> But unfortunatetly it's infected with virus and worms
> How can i protect my Server ?What is the best solution to protect it ?
> Should i use IPS or NAC ?
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 24 2011 - 23:35:07 ART