Re: Priority Queuing Doubt

Hi
Sorry when u said the TX Ring you mean the input or output ? I thought the policing is always done on Input/ingress ??
Thanks so much

On 2011-06-25, at 10:49 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote:

> Both will work, so the smaller one mandates.
> There's a difference though: the explicit policer works all the time,
> but implicit one only works when the high level queueing is engaged,
> i.e. when the tx ring of the output interface fills up.
>
> -Carlos
>
> Routing Freak @ 25/06/2011 09:45 -0300 dixit:
>> Hi fellows,
>> When i give a priority command it is a low latency queuing and there is a in
>> built policing in priority command
>> priority 4500
>> it is like voice packet gets policed to 4500 bits
>> but when there is explicit policing configured , which will take precedence,
>> whether the police command or th epolice command
>> priority 4500
>> police cir 5000 1000 1000 conform transmit exceed drop
>> Can someone give me an better example for this and explain this feature
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jun 25 2011 - 15:08:38 ART