Re: Priority Queuing Doubt

Both will work, so the smaller one mandates.
There's a difference though: the explicit policer works all the time,
but implicit one only works when the high level queueing is engaged,
i.e. when the tx ring of the output interface fills up.

-Carlos

Routing Freak @ 25/06/2011 09:45 -0300 dixit:
> Hi fellows,
>
> When i give a priority command it is a low latency queuing and there is a in
> built policing in priority command
>
> priority 4500
>
> it is like voice packet gets policed to 4500 bits
>
> but when there is explicit policing configured , which will take precedence,
> whether the police command or th epolice command
>
> priority 4500
> police cir 5000 1000 1000 conform transmit exceed drop
>
> Can someone give me an better example for this and explain this feature
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net