Re: BGP peer conferdations

From: me you <anunda19_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:21:17 +0430

Thank you for the replay. I understand the concept behind confederations;
however, is there a difference in peering the neighbors between the AS
number or confederation number?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Christian Hunter <stasis416_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> If you wanted to use a private cofederation ASN internally or segment
> your networks if your an ISP. Maybe my DSL network is in its own
> private ASN. And your public ASN facing the world. If gives you
> flexibility, and messes with the iBGP next-hop rules in the lab :)
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:21 AM, me you <anunda19_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > With BGP conferdations you can peer with either the actual AS number or
> the
> > Conferdations number. What is the difference with the two.
> >
> > Example of configs.
> >
> > R2
> > router bgp 2000
> > bgp conferdation identifer 100
> > bgp conferdation peer 1000
> > nei 172.16.23.3 remot 100
> >
> > R3
> > router bgp 1000
> > bgp conferdation identifer 100
> > bgp conferdation peer 2000
> > nei 172.16.23.2 remot 100
> > Also works to for
> >
> > R2
> > router bgp 2000
> > bgp conferation identif 100
> > bgp conferdation peer 1000
> > nei 172.16.23.3 remot 1000
> >
> > R3
> > router bgp 1000
> > bgp conferdation identifer 100
> > bgp conferdation peer 2000
> > nei 172.16.23.2 remot 2000
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jun 23 2011 - 18:21:17 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 01 2011 - 06:24:28 ART