All,
I noticed a lot of tail drops in the CBWFQ service policy even when the
traffic is well below the shaping average and suspecting it is due to the
traffic being bursty and queue size is too small.. Can anybody suggest good
troubleshooting commands/instructions to confirm the facts.. Also, How do I
achieve /calculate optimum queue size for a given scenario
policy-map POL-PIR-24000
class class-default
shape average 24000000
service-policy child-eigrp
!
policy-map child-eigrp
class EIGRP
bandwidth percent 5
class class-default
bandwidth percent 95
sh policy-map interface Gi0/3.1454
GigabitEthernet0/3.1454
Service-policy output: POL-PIR-24000
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
3507361659 packets, 1331902377498 bytes
5 minute offered rate 5820000 bps, drop rate 1444000 bps
Match: any
Traffic Shaping
Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
24000000/24000000 150000 600000 600000 25 75000
Adapt Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
Active Depth Delayed Delayed Active
- 0 3384657739 2059632195 237539998 61135324 no
Service-policy : child-eigrp
Class-map: EIGRP (match-any)
2851680 packets, 337279531 bytes
5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: access-group name Seigrp
2851680 packets, 337279531 bytes
5 minute rate 0 bps
Queueing
Output Queue: Conversation 265
Bandwidth 5 (%)
Bandwidth 1200 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
(pkts matched/bytes matched) 25/3039
(depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
3504510053 packets, 1331565104583 bytes
5 minute offered rate 5820000 bps, drop rate 1444000 bps
Match: any
Queueing
Output Queue: Conversation 266
Bandwidth 95 (%)
Bandwidth 22800 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
(pkts matched/bytes matched) 360229491/372124665094
(depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/122704071/0
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jun 23 2011 - 15:27:27 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 01 2011 - 06:24:28 ART