Re: NAT issue

From: Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:33:30 +0200

Let him test my theory and if I am wrong then I will think up some cool
excuse lol

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Joe Astorino <joeastorino1982_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> That doesn't make sense as he is doing static PAT not dynamic PAT. Am I
> missing something?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> You need the overload command on your actual NAT statement. Whether you
>> are using a pool or merely natting out of an interface put the overload
>> command on the end of that statement
>>
>> CCIE # 23962 (SP)
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone 4
>>
>> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino
> CCIE #24347
> Blog: http://astorinonetworks.com
>
> "He not busy being born is busy dying" - Dylan

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jun 21 2011 - 14:33:30 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 01 2011 - 06:24:28 ART