Re: Class "A" prefix-list

I beleive that 0.0.0.0/0 is just permitting a default route.

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:55 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes Thank you for pointing out. As you can see, I took a pretty bad
> stab at it but I too want to strengthen understanding of the concept.
> I hope a call out to Scott Morris... or any of the elite could shed
> some light. Gratefully appreciated whoever that might be....
>
> Marc Edwards DCNISS
> http://reno-ccie.blogspopt.com
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Hammer cisco <cisco.iers_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Marc ,
>>
>> why u mention 10 in your prefix-list , we can say 0.0.0.0/0 as we need to
>> make sure that the first bit will be 0 in "Binay" to indicate class A
>>
>> On 1 June 2011 22:46, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> All in an A... this is reference of a B
>>>
>>> p prefix-list B permit 128.0.0.0/2 ge 17 - Any subnet in class B address
>>> space
>>>
>>> So A would be
>>>
>>> permit 10.0.0.0/1 ge 8
>>>
>>> possibly... correct me if im wrong
>>>
>>> Marc Edwards DCNISS
>>> http://reno-ccie.blogspot.com
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Hammer cisco <cisco.iers_at_gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi experts,
>>> >
>>> > i am a little bit confused about the exact prefix-list we can use to
>>> > match
>>> > all class A network address routes :
>>> >
>>> > ip prefix-list 0.0.0.0/1 ge 8
>>> >
>>> > or
>>> >
>>> > ip prefix-list 0.0.0.0/1 le 32
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jun 01 2011 - 12:57:05 ART