Re: Class "A" prefix-list

yupe

On 1 June 2011 22:57, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I beleive that 0.0.0.0/0 is just permitting a default route.
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:55 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes Thank you for pointing out. As you can see, I took a pretty bad
> > stab at it but I too want to strengthen understanding of the concept.
> > I hope a call out to Scott Morris... or any of the elite could shed
> > some light. Gratefully appreciated whoever that might be....
> >
> > Marc Edwards DCNISS
> > http://reno-ccie.blogspopt.com
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Hammer cisco <cisco.iers_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi Marc ,
> >>
> >> why u mention 10 in your prefix-list , we can say 0.0.0.0/0 as we need
> to
> >> make sure that the first bit will be 0 in "Binay" to indicate class A
> >>
> >> On 1 June 2011 22:46, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> All in an A... this is reference of a B
> >>>
> >>> p prefix-list B permit 128.0.0.0/2 ge 17 - Any subnet in class B
> address
> >>> space
> >>>
> >>> So A would be
> >>>
> >>> permit 10.0.0.0/1 ge 8
> >>>
> >>> possibly... correct me if im wrong
> >>>
> >>> Marc Edwards DCNISS
> >>> http://reno-ccie.blogspot.com
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Hammer cisco <cisco.iers_at_gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Hi experts,
> >>> >
> >>> > i am a little bit confused about the exact prefix-list we can use to
> >>> > match
> >>> > all class A network address routes :
> >>> >
> >>> > ip prefix-list 0.0.0.0/1 ge 8
> >>> >
> >>> > or
> >>> >
> >>> > ip prefix-list 0.0.0.0/1 le 32
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>> >
> >>> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jun 01 2011 - 22:57:38 ART