My solution to this was to use 4 3550s in my lab and only emulate the
routers. While this was more expensive than a full GNS3/dynamips lab, it
was certainly cheaper than a full lab. The only shortfalls I have currently
are 3550 vs 3560 feature-wise. Best of both worlds really. Would I have
preferred a full rack of gear? Of course, but reality intervened in my
case.
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Michael Kiefer <mjkiefer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Expect lots of problems with INE's .net. It's not that it is inherently bad
> or anything, it's just that their topology suffers badly in dynamips. You
> will run into to all of the usual dynamips problems that don't exist on the
> real gear. Things will get worse as you start complicating the config.
>
> Narbik's workbooks are top notch and will give you a whole lot more bang
> for
> the buck as far as dynamips is considered. 95% of his labs only involve 3 -
> 5 routers and can use the default dynamips layer 2 switches.
>
> That's my 2 cents.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Shane K <shanekgs_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Are you guys using the INE.net file for VOL1?
> > Any issues?
> >
> > S
> >
> > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Elliott Reyes <
> > fontananetworkengineer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I tried this suggestion earlier with my INE .net file and was able to
> run
> > > all routers at around 21 percent CPU. I just had problems with the
> > >
> > > Switches I couldnt add my vlans without getting a error.
> > >
> > > I'm using INE for the VOL I scenario's.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Daniel Dib <daniel.dib_at_reaper.nu>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > > I found a tip about tweaking the idlemax value to 100 which
> drastically
> > > > decreases the CPU load. With it enabled I can run the full INE
> topology
> > > in
> > > > Windows 7 on my laptop, without it I can't even start all the
> routers.
> > > When
> > > > it is enabled I have about 20-40% CPU-load. I can't really find a
> good
> > > > description of what this really does.
> > > >
> > > > According to Greg:" idlemax is the number of times that the code
> > executes
> > > > the address defined as the idlepc value before going to sleep. The
> > > default
> > > > is 1500 times."
> > > >
> > > > Are any of you other guys running this and have you seen any
> > implications
> > > > of
> > > > doing it? Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > > /Daniel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed May 18 2011 - 11:26:23 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART