Re: nssa no-redistribute command

Good question and comment.

A totally Stub area does inject the default route ... Does this break a
requirement? Oh boy ...

Speaking for myself, some of the question and task statements are
interpretive and hard to figure out which solution is being called for. To
make matters even more confusing, there may be a 'general guideline' stated
earlier in the lab which may impact the task at hand. Lord help me ...

The lab testing I did helped me enormously see the effect of this command.
Previously I did not think this command had any effect ...

I just hope the lab is clear in what is being asked ... I hate to lose
points for something I understand. This needs to be a lab which determines
a candidate's expertise ... not their reading level or sneaky-ness.

Lol ...

Andrew Lissitz

.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Jacek <q.192.168.1.0_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I do not think that lab requirement and official answer are correct.
> Statement "no summary no-redistribution" will inject inter-area default
> route into NSSA. Does it break requirement "Do not allow any external or
> inter area OSPF routing information to enter
> Area 26 from R1" ?
>
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net