Re: CONNECTED route leaking using VRF lite

The key to his statement is running MP-BGP. Just remember if you want a VRF
to leak a route to another VRF without using MP-BGP you will need the
"Router on a Stick" concept to accomplish it

Paul

-- 
Paul Negron
CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
Senior Technical Instructor
www.micronicstraining.com
> From: Harindha Fernando <pottaharry_at_gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Harindha Fernando <pottaharry_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:07:40 +0300
> To: Tech Guy <autechguy_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: CCIE Lab <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: CONNECTED route leaking using VRF lite
> 
> yes, you need to configure correct RT for import export and then do the
> redistribution under address-family ipv4 vrf in BGP
> 
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Tech Guy <autechguy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Group,
>> 
>> The concept of leaking routes between VRF using VRF lite is straigh
>> forward. Option using static routes are the simplest. However all
>> examplesI have all use the non directly connected route.
>> 
>> My question is: is it possible to leak connected route between VRF?
>> 
>> Specifically, if I have two loopbacks on the same router running VRF lite:
>> Loopback1 in VRF Red, and
>> Loopback2 in VRF Blue
>> 
>> Can I leak Loopback1 into Blue and Loopback2 into Red so that I can
>> ping between the two loopback addresses.
>> 
>> Thanks in advance.
>> 
>> Techie,
>> 
>> 
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> 
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net