Re: CONNECTED route leaking using VRF lite

From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 11:32:43 -0700

Hello,

You will need to involve MP-BGP in your solution for this problem. I
wrote an article on this subject few months back, you may find it an
useful read:

http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/12/01/vrf-route-leaking/

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 21:08, Tech Guy <autechguy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Group,
>
> The concept of leaking routes between VRF using VRF lite is straigh
> forward. Option using static routes are the simplest. However all
> examplesI have all use the non directly connected route.
>
> My question is: is it possible to leak connected route between VRF?
>
> Specifically, if I have two loopbacks on the same router running VRF lite:
> Loopback1 in VRF Red, and
> Loopback2 in VRF Blue
>
> Can I leak Loopback1 into Blue and Loopback2 into Red so that I can
> ping between the two loopback addresses.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Techie,
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri May 06 2011 - 11:32:43 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART