Re: Main/Backup scenario with Dynamic routing protocol issue

From: Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 12:53:23 +0200

No I mean replacing RIP with BGP as the PE_CE routing protocol

You could then redistribute BGP into RIP and vice versa if need be.

CCIE # 23962 (SP)

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jason Alex <amr.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you mean using route damping with BGP ?
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Have you thought about running BGP ?
>>
>> CCIE # 23962 (SP)
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone 4
>>
>> On 05 May 2011, at 10:54 AM, Jason Alex <amr.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Dear All,
>> > Kindly be informed that i have a problem with my connection
>> > with the Service provider.
>> > I am currently having two connections per remote site , one act as a
>> main
>> > and the other is backup
>> >
>> > I am using RIP as a dynamic protocol with my Service provider.
>> >
>> > My problem is whenever the Main link flaps physically by going UP & down
>> due
>> > to physical problem , RIP is flapping between the Main and backup link ,
>> and
>> > as a result the site goes down with no reachability.
>> >
>> > I am facing this problem in many sites , is there is any soln. by
>> changing
>> > my routing protocol for example ?, to help me to fix this problem.
>> >
>> > Appreciate your feedback
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 05 2011 - 12:53:23 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART