Re: Main/Backup scenario with Dynamic routing protocol issue

From: Byron Chen <byronschen_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:47:25 +0100

Hi, If you have 2 connections to the same Service Provider,

why not use RIP with a floating static route as backup ?. If you had 2
connections to 2 different Service providers, I would

use BGP with the necessary precautions.

Regards

Byron

On 5 May 2011 10:01, Jason Alex <amr.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you mean using route damping with BGP ?
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Shaughn Smith <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Have you thought about running BGP ?
> >
> > CCIE # 23962 (SP)
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone 4
> >
> > On 05 May 2011, at 10:54 AM, Jason Alex <amr.ccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear All,
> > > Kindly be informed that i have a problem with my connection
> > > with the Service provider.
> > > I am currently having two connections per remote site , one act as a
> main
> > > and the other is backup
> > >
> > > I am using RIP as a dynamic protocol with my Service provider.
> > >
> > > My problem is whenever the Main link flaps physically by going UP &
> down
> > due
> > > to physical problem , RIP is flapping between the Main and backup link
> ,
> > and
> > > as a result the site goes down with no reachability.
> > >
> > > I am facing this problem in many sites , is there is any soln. by
> > changing
> > > my routing protocol for example ?, to help me to fix this problem.
> > >
> > > Appreciate your feedback
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 05 2011 - 11:47:25 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 01 2011 - 09:01:11 ART