Nick,
Fully agree with you. Hey let us know the outcome of the dinner with John Chambers :-)
Regards
Roger
Sent from my iPad
On 13.04.2011, at 15:45, Carl Gosselin <carl.gosselin_at_altizone.com> wrote:
> Nick,
> 
> The concerns you raise are valid concerns but most of those are already
> passed. The code has been released on the net.
> 
> For that matter, any company that decides to copy the Cisco Intellectual
> Property can do so (dare I mention a Chinese supplier??) depending on the
> support of the local government.
> 
> Regarding the cost, they already have a delivery chain so adding this new
> software on the choices of IOS version is not that much of a stretch (just
> have to be compiled and released on Unix platform). Besides they do all of
> that today for their internal needs.
> 
> Also nobody says they should do it for free.... They should be able to have
> a small service contract to allow registered partners and customers access
> to that software download. All of these processes are in place today but
> that could mean extra manpower so yes a small fee should be required.
> 
> Microsoft does all this for $500USD yearly.
> 
> The learning network's offering is good thing for the community is general
> but really it is Cisco's training PNL looking to get revenue from the rack
> rental business without having to pay for the hardware. This is bad business
> because Cisco's is hurting the companies that have helped them grow the
> overall knowledge base of their core technologies. They will also sell less
> hardware if the rack rentals can't make a profit...
> 
> I can't comment on the the quality of the 360 Program but bringing in the
> training into Cisco is nothing to be happy about also. Other big companies
> had that model before and their knowledge base never flourished as much as
> Cisco's did.... If it's not broken don't fix it, but again more revenues for
> the PNL. It's kind of funny, all the other suppliers (HP, Juniper, etc) are
> now trying to copy Cisco's training strategy anyway...
> 
> I know what my question to John Chambers will be during the Netvet's dinner
> at this year's Networkers....
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -Carl
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Nick Matthews <matthn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I think Cisco would very much like to do this.  It's not quite as
>> simple as just releasing it, however.
>> 
>> What's a greater risk - having some dissatisfied customers or
>> releasing unix code that is implemented into a chip and is released as
>> a competitive product?  What's the potential for lost revenue if
>> people use the product for production traffic?  It may sound extreme,
>> but the probability is not zero.
>> 
>> As well, there's infrastructure and support costs for releasing the
>> product.  It's worth doing, but it may not have been viable
>> previously.  IOU is a Cisco engineering tool and it has been like that
>> for a number of reasons.
>> 
>> I think this learning offering is Cisco's first step into this, and
>> there's more to come.  I believe the switching infrastructure on the
>> lab exam is virtualized, so it would be logical to assume that would
>> be part of this offering at some point.  That would change things in
>> terms of rack rentals in my opinion.
>> 
>> -nick
>> 
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Carl Gosselin
>> <carl.gosselin_at_altizone.com> wrote:
>>> Guys,
>>> I don't know if many of you are self employed or owners of small
>>> proffesional services enterprises but I find that Cisco is not being fair
>>> when it does not release tools such as IOU or L2IOU to all it's partners
>> and
>>> clients. Tools like Dynamips are totally integrated in the way we design
>> and
>>> build solutions for our clients today, this in returns guaranties a Cisco
>>> sale... I would assume it would be in their interest to allow us to use
>>> tools in the long term.
>>> 
>>> If they would only look at what the competition is doing, and I mean
>>> Microsoft here, for a minimal yearly service contract (TechNet) you have
>>> access to all their software for testing purposes. The real software...
>>> 
>>> I would be more then willing to pay a service contract for Cisco too, if
>> I
>>> could get legitimate tools and know they would get maintained.
>>> 
>>> I think this group could be influential with such an approach with Cisco.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> - Carl
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> From a CCIE perspective, I don't think you'll find a lot of change.
>>>> Like ANY of the simulators, it's not perfect.  Especially as you get
>>>> into more complicated scenarios and complex labs.  There's no replacing
>>>> real, live equipment.
>>>> 
>>>> For the lower-end courses though, it's a great way to give people access
>>>> to things and control what's happening.
>>>> 
>>>> Your first two-wheel bike will help you with learning to rider, however,
>>>> it will NOT allow you to win a triathlon.  ;)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>>>> 
>>>> CCDE #2009::D, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIE-ER #102, CISSP, et al.
>>>> 
>>>> CCSI #21903, JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>>>> 
>>>> swm_at_emanon.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Knowledge is power.
>>>> 
>>>> Power corrupts.
>>>> 
>>>> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/12/11 10:48 AM, JB Poplawski wrote:
>>>>> Any Third Party Providers have any comments?  I'm assuming this could
>>>>> snag some lab rental time away.  I still have my 3 (INE, IPE and
>>>>> Micronics) just need some time to get it done.
>>>>> JB
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Nadeem Rafi <nrafia_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> They have announced there few labs and each lab have some sub topics.
>>>> Price
>>>>>> is not much heighr, its around 50 to 75 for 25 hours of time. Labs
>> are
>>>>>> clearly saying Unix IOU. Labs range from ccna to ccip, ccnp
>> (switching
>>>> and
>>>>>> route) few with MPLS but no ccie level lab. But good thing, i hope,
>> will
>>>> be
>>>>>> to get used to lab interface. I assume most probably both interfaces
>>>> will be
>>>>>> same, but i am not sure, only one with both worlds can tell what is
>>>>>> similarity there.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> HTH
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Dan Shechter <danshtr_at_gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> cisco learning network is down. did you had the chance to actually
>> see
>>>> what
>>>>>>> is it all about?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>> Dan #13685 (RS/Sec/SP)
>>>>>>> The CCIE troubleshooting blog: http://dans-net.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Nadeem Rafi <nrafia_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> *Cisco Announces a Networking Education Breakthrough with Cisco
>>>> Learning
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Labs*
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cisco announces a networking education breakthrough with Cisco
>>>> Learning
>>>>>>>> Labs. For the first time, IT learners can now access real Cisco
>> labs
>>>> with
>>>>>>>> both routing and Layer 2 core switching features.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cisco Learning Labs are powered by Cisco IOS. Software on UNIX and
>>>> enable
>>>>>>>> critical, hands-on lab experience for future networking engineers
>>>>>>>> interested
>>>>>>>> in attaining Cisco certifications.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Elevate your study program with Cisco Learning Labs today and enjoy
>>>> the
>>>>>>>> variety of lab bundles for Cisco CCNA., Cisco CCNP., and Cisco
>> CCIP.
>>>>>>>> certification preparation.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Cisco Learning Labs are available exclusively on the Cisco Learning
>>>>>>>> Network
>>>>>>>> Store.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Review all lab bundles and pricing information
>>>>>>>> now.<
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> http://mkto-cs0007.com/track?type=click&enid=bWFpbGluZ2lkPWNpc2NvQmV0YWN
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 1c3QtMTI3MC02NzAtMC0xMjU5LXByb2QtNzkyJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD0wJmRhdGFiYXNlaWQ9NzkyJnNl<
>>>> 
>> http://mkto-cs0007.com/track?type=click&enid=bWFpbGluZ2lkPWNpc2NvQmV0YWN1c3QtMTI3MC02NzAtMC0xMjU5LXByb2QtNzkyJm1lc3NhZ2VpZD0wJmRhdGFiYXNlaWQ9NzkyJnNl
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> cmlhbD0xMjc5MDY5OTA4JmVtYWlsaWQ9bnJhZmlhQGdtYWlsLmNvbSZ1c2VyaWQ9MTU0OTAxJmV4d
>>>>>>>> HJhPSYmJg==&&&
>>>>>>>> http://www.cisco.com/go/learninglabs?mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRonua
>>>>>>>> vJZKXonjHpfsX57ugkWaag38431UFwdcjKPmjr1YIDSct0dvycMRAVFZl5nQ9RCeOa<
>>>> 
>> http://www.cisco.com/go/learninglabs?mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRonuavJZKXonjHpfsX57ugkWaag38431UFwdcjKPmjr1YIDSct0dvycMRAVFZl5nQ9RCeOa
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Apr 13 2011 - 19:34:07 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun May 01 2011 - 09:00:29 ART