Re: Command Preference?

Tyson,

I see your point, and I totally respect it. But to me, telling the code to
ignore a check which maybe should not have been there to begin with is more
of a fix than a patch. But i could be wrong, i guess it all depends how you
look at it. But I definitely see what you are saying.

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>wrote:

> +1
>
> ...although I would have said "instead of applying a patch to a problem" :)
>
> OSPF does this on purpouse, to test link is viable to carry small (hellos)
> and large packets. Disabling the test is like silencing the alarm, problem
> is still there, might byte you later.
>
> -Carlos
>
> Tyson Scott @ 29/03/2011 03:05 -0300 dixit:
>
> system mtu routing fixes a problem instead of applying a fix to a problem.
>> Obviously you will always have to follow the lab requirements but my
>> preference is simply a mindset. Just like with a real network.
>> Preferably
>> you will fix the underlying issues by fixing the design instead of
>> applying "
>> CCIE" tactics to work around issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:larryh12203_at_gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:24 PM
>> To: Narbik Kocharians
>> Cc: Tyson Scott; Cisco certification; ALL From_NJ
>> Subject: Re: Command Preference?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ok, I have to ask, Tyson, why do you prefer the system mtu routing 1500
>> choice?
>>
>> I would recommend to be careful with the wording of the requirement if
>> this
>> was in a lab setting to be sure which one they were asking you to use.
>>
>> The requirement might say - Do not disable mismatch detection on
>> receiving
>> DBD packets which would lead one to use the system mtu routing choice.
>>
>> If the requirement said - do not use any global configuration command to
>> allow
>> the OSPF relationship to form, then that would lead to using the ip ospf
>> mtu-ignore command.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Larry Hadrava
>> CCIE #12203
>> Check Out MyBlog: http://ccie12203.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Narbik Kocharians" <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
>> To: "ALL From_NJ" <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
>> Cc: "Tyson Scott" <tscott_at_ipexpert.com>, "Cisco certification"
>> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:10:10 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: Command Preference?
>>
>> The only reason i liked the "ip ospf mtu-ignore" is just incase i have to
>> establish an OSPF session with another box. If this is configured, then, i
>> don't have to worry about it. But i am sure we all have our reasons why we
>> chose one option versus the other.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:23 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks everyone! I appreciate hearing your perspectives!
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I prefer the first.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>>>> ALL
>>>> From_NJ
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 9:01 PM
>>>> To: Cisco certification
>>>> Subject: Re: Command Preference?
>>>>
>>>> ok, sent too soon ... sorry about that.
>>>>
>>>> If you are allow to use either, do you have a preference when peering
>>>>
>>> with
>>>
>>>> a
>>>> switch?
>>>>
>>>> system mtu routing 1500
>>>> or
>>>> ip ospf ignore-mtu
>>>>
>>>> seems that setting the system mtu routing might save you some trouble
>>>>
>>> later
>>>
>>>> on ...
>>>>
>>>> Your thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I know either one will work IF YOU ARE ALLOWED
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> *Narbik Kocharians
>> *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>> www.MicronicsTraining.com <http://www.micronicstraining.com/> <
>> http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
>> Sr. Technical Instructor
>> *Ask about our FREE Lab Voucher with our Boot Camps*
>> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
>> Training & Remote Racks available
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
>

-- 
*Narbik Kocharians
*CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com <http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
Sr. Technical Instructor
*Ask about our FREE Lab Voucher with our Boot Camps*
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training & Remote Racks available
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net