Re: Command Preference?

From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 06:53:12 -0300

+1

...although I would have said "instead of applying a patch to a problem" :)

OSPF does this on purpouse, to test link is viable to carry small
(hellos) and large packets. Disabling the test is like silencing the
alarm, problem is still there, might byte you later.

-Carlos

Tyson Scott @ 29/03/2011 03:05 -0300 dixit:
> system mtu routing fixes a problem instead of applying a fix to a problem.
> Obviously you will always have to follow the lab requirements but my
> preference is simply a mindset. Just like with a real network. Preferably
> you will fix the underlying issues by fixing the design instead of applying "
> CCIE" tactics to work around issues.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Larry Hadrava [mailto:larryh12203_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:24 PM
> To: Narbik Kocharians
> Cc: Tyson Scott; Cisco certification; ALL From_NJ
> Subject: Re: Command Preference?
>
>
>
> Ok, I have to ask, Tyson, why do you prefer the system mtu routing 1500
> choice?
>
> I would recommend to be careful with the wording of the requirement if this
> was in a lab setting to be sure which one they were asking you to use.
>
> The requirement might say - Do not disable mismatch detection on receiving
> DBD packets which would lead one to use the system mtu routing choice.
>
> If the requirement said - do not use any global configuration command to allow
> the OSPF relationship to form, then that would lead to using the ip ospf
> mtu-ignore command.
>
> Thanks
> Larry Hadrava
> CCIE #12203
> Check Out MyBlog: http://ccie12203.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Narbik Kocharians" <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
> To: "ALL From_NJ" <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: "Tyson Scott" <tscott_at_ipexpert.com>, "Cisco certification"
> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 5:10:10 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: Command Preference?
>
> The only reason i liked the "ip ospf mtu-ignore" is just incase i have to
> establish an OSPF session with another box. If this is configured, then, i
> don't have to worry about it. But i am sure we all have our reasons why we
> chose one option versus the other.
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:23 PM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone! I appreciate hearing your perspectives!
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Tyson Scott <tscott_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I prefer the first.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>>> ALL
>>> From_NJ
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 9:01 PM
>>> To: Cisco certification
>>> Subject: Re: Command Preference?
>>>
>>> ok, sent too soon ... sorry about that.
>>>
>>> If you are allow to use either, do you have a preference when peering
>> with
>>> a
>>> switch?
>>>
>>> system mtu routing 1500
>>> or
>>> ip ospf ignore-mtu
>>>
>>> seems that setting the system mtu routing might save you some trouble
>> later
>>> on ...
>>>
>>> Your thoughts?
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I know either one will work IF YOU ARE ALLOWED
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Narbik Kocharians
> *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> www.MicronicsTraining.com <http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
> Sr. Technical Instructor
> *Ask about our FREE Lab Voucher with our Boot Camps*
> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> Training & Remote Racks available
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Mar 29 2011 - 06:53:12 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 06:35:42 ART