Great.. Thanks Marko.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
> You don't need it, but it's recommended. When you don't have it, IOS
> will warn you about it. If you know what you're doing (i.e. you are
> using different mask on your Loopback or using a different interface
> as LDP Router-ID), you can safely ignore it.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 17:19, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm trying to understand why in MPLS using LDP you need a host route
> (/32)
> > to the LDP router ID, can anyone explain or point me somewhere?
> >
> > Rack1R5#sh mpls ldp discovery detail
> > Local LDP Identifier:
> > 150.1.5.5:0
> > Discovery Sources:
> > Interfaces:
> > Serial0/0/1 (ldp): xmit/recv
> > Enabled: Interface config
> > Hello interval: 5000 ms; Transport IP addr: 150.1.5.5
> > LDP Id: 155.1.146.4:0; no host route to transport addr
> > <-----no host route
> > Src IP addr: 155.1.45.4; Transport IP addr: 155.1.146.4
> > Hold time: 15 sec; Proposed local/peer: 15/15 sec
> > Reachable via 155.1.146.0/24
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any help.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jan 22 2011 - 13:51:53 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 01 2011 - 07:39:17 ART