RE: 360 lab 16 - bgp solution

From: Tony Schaffran \(GS\) <groupstudy_at_cconlinelabs.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 07:21:57 -0800

You need to remember one thing when you are taking the lab.

This is a lab.

You will definitely not be configuring best practices when satisfying most
of the lab requirements.

Tony Schaffran
Sr. Network Consultant
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ladee Geek
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 6:53 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: 360 lab 16 - bgp solution

Hey guys 

I think lab 16 is missing a pretty significant requirement for bgp. Would
like a second opinion. I don t think you will need to lab it up. I think
some white boarding or drawing it on paper will do.

In my opinion the solution requires redistribution of the bgp routes
advertized from Sw3 into EIGRP on Sw2. I say that because of the black hole
r2 creates since its not running bgp. I know the traffic is being
preferred over r1, but Im thinking that if anything happens to r1 and the
bgp routes enter AS 100 via R3 without the redistribution the connectivity
will fail.

Would the test identify that the redundant path must be viable. This
scenario did not.

Thanks in advance.

--
r/
LG
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jan 02 2011 - 07:21:57 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Feb 01 2011 - 07:39:17 ART