Spam detection software, running on the system "groupstudy.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
admin_at_groupstudy.com for details.
Content preview: So what needs to be done to get the spam warnings from cluttering
the messages? Regards, Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP Sent from my iPhone http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com
On Dec 20, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: [...]
Content analysis details: (7.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
5.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: ipexpert.com]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (jay.mcmickle[at]yahoo.com)
0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
CUSTOM_MED
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
trust
[98.136.185.195 listed in list.dnswl.org]
1.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
[score: 0.5000]
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list
Received: from smtp104-mob.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
(smtp104-mob.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.185.195]) by
groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id oBLDd8Gb031510
GroupStudy Mailer; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:39:08 -0500
Received: (qmail 37075 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2010 13:39:02 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:References:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Cc:X-Mailer:From:X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid:Subject:Date:To;
b=oUa+pCiK2qlQwNv5TwJRlenPtGbmA1eQp9koRgiL1/5Re0TByYTvbFrrs6hGfwW3UQaNQIQ86n03CEv5iMGv0Q1gOfhOoYXxb/dpWMt9isZgGo9ysFXm3iS/13UH8NDCTQ9sfMCJ7xmWRFeiwg2aAKLOKP5c0MMPfWzCgxscnrE=
;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com;
s=s1024; t=1292938742;
bh=pUfZwhlSF/oMwdWbMQ9TO3888tHsV/xEHHKn8wQm+gs=;
h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:References:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Cc:X-Mailer:From:X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid:Subject:Date:To;
b=YF83pTCpUAp1hZxNINXeNcv6nSBHF9ba5W2yKxzQJNlxdxNmGnFaVGOgJKL0dwoDtEn6Q98ypjQgfyM2gMUFihRDlkTCXs0rt4MMp+GV3Wc5UF054CfWovU2PxHNIoYjKiCKQ/dZVGLGGDrciiyoF/wjxap5fQf17YQYiP4QsqM=
Received: from [10.22.88.120] (jay.mcmickle_at_166.205.12.224 with
xymcookie) by smtp104-mob.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Dec
2010 05:39:00 -0800 PST
X-Yahoo-SMTP: ODsPq8WswBDKhtxm7HuN7JDOlGEatYR7Gw--
X-YMail-OSG: s3tSbQwVM1mTi5gYGzIr9eUqh8srF9lQih4mnwvaoXRYSZn
KzKKg7hy1CuRpikT3WYaRZl_CXWUm2iksBod9_22mvzcpoXU1oEH6VVr9F76
z657K8KhZURTpdSO0_tUcLulFM_cVyr9daz0PYaxnO4l1eQVEwKwMJUOP3n_
rSukNK0cONGe6vQpqQDD3QeZWzU_3n7bIOmR4csVHE_r_GUkvD4lLfJKkPwj
42HmeOQvCxBg5Ynf7Vs1bPPXc5eoA2bQfp_QKqVakiiKTX7RAUUdXhCK8dOS
0yadUfKSxI7iHUIICGBFv2XKavtPr9dAs5z99tiETJuCPdM.Wx9T24s4oGBf
hZHpaE5tqnDlSrb2tWHKJ13wF0Nbf.0nYsMoZNGGS7g--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
References: <AANLkTinCEyeE8YEUBVqMNhatoqkK0n2kdJrTB3OboRdn_at_mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinCEyeE8YEUBVqMNhatoqkK0n2kdJrTB3OboRdn_at_mail.gmail.com>
X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: Inbox
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <321E34F9-FE74-4E69-8494-D3E8FF3FCAB6_at_yahoo.com>
Cc: Aamir Aziz <aamiraz77_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148)
From: Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>
X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 1_63926_ANg6vs4AATt4TRCXkwcF7gxROyU
Subject: Re: MDT
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:39:07 -0600
To: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by groupstudy.com id
oBLDd8Gb031510
So what needs to be done to get the spam warnings from cluttering the messages?
Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
Sent from my iPhone
http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com
On Dec 20, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
> Spam detection software, running on the system "groupstudy.com", has
> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
> similar future email. If you have any questions, see
> admin_at_groupstudy.com for details.
>
> Content preview: Try running "show derived-config interface tunnel0". Tunnels
> that are created are not static in nature and are therefore not present in
> the "running-configuration". You can still see how they were dynamically
> configured using the command above. [...]
>
> Content analysis details: (5.8 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
> -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
> trust
> [74.125.82.49 listed in list.dnswl.org]
> 5.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
> [URIs: ipexpert.com]
> 1.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
> [score: 0.5000]
> Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com (mail-ww0-f49.google.com
> [74.125.82.49]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with
> ESMTP id oBKHEFIt023719 GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:14:16
> -0500
> Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so3150026wwb.30 for
> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:14:10 -0800 (PST)
> Received: by 10.227.138.73 with SMTP id z9mr2846572wbt.97.1292865250122;
> Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:14:10 -0800 (PST)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.227.148.5 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:13:48 -0800
> (PST)
> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinQ4YX9t=-_iXMKDgzTT5SuDFXS=X=YTWfz32pg_at_mail.gmail.com>
> References: <AANLkTinQ4YX9t=-_iXMKDgzTT5SuDFXS=X=YTWfz32pg_at_mail.gmail.com>
> From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:13:48 +0000
> Message-ID: <AANLkTinCEyeE8YEUBVqMNhatoqkK0n2kdJrTB3OboRdn_at_mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: MDT
> To: Aamir Aziz <aamiraz77_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Try running "show derived-config interface tunnel0". Tunnels that are
> created are not static in nature and are therefore not present in the
> "running-configuration". You can still see how they were dynamically
> configured using the command above.
>
> Tunnels are multipoint GRE and have the destination address of the MDT
> default group. Each PE interested in receiving traffic for that group
> will join the group - that's how they attract the traffic and make
> tunnels come up.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>
> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:43, Aamir Aziz <aamiraz77_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear *,
>>
>> I have a basic question about MDT. So when we issue the command on a
>> PE mdt default x.x.x.x under ip vrf the routers creates a tunnel based
>> on lo0 and tunnel comes up. On the other end PE the same thing happen
>> and multicast (vrf) traffic goes via this tunnel. The question is when
>> i do sh run tunnel 0 i dont see any configuration so how did the
>> tunnel come up and how does the router know how to reach the other
>> end?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aamir
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Dec 21 2010 - 07:39:07 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 01 2011 - 09:37:49 ART