Re: MDT

They sure are annoying. Paul?

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 13:39, Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> So what needs to be done to get the spam warnings from cluttering the messages?
>
> Regards,
> Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
> Sent from my iPhone
> http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>
>> Spam detection software, running on the system "groupstudy.com", has
>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. B The original message
>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
>> similar future email. B If you have any questions, see
>> admin_at_groupstudy.com for details.
>>
>> Content preview: B Try running "show derived-config interface tunnel0". Tunnels
>> B  that are created are not static in nature and are therefore not present in
>> B  the "running-configuration". You can still see how they were dynamically
>> B configured using the command above. [...]
>>
>> Content analysis details: B  (5.8 points, 5.0 required)
>>
>> pts rule name B  B  B  B  B  B  B description
>> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
>> -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW B  B  B RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
>> B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B trust
>> B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B [74.125.82.49 listed in list.dnswl.org]
>> 5.0 URIBL_BLACK B  B  B  B  B  B Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
>> B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B [URIs: ipexpert.com]
>> 1.5 BAYES_50 B  B  B  B  B  B  B  BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
>> B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B  B [score: 0.5000]
>> Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com (mail-ww0-f49.google.com
>> B [74.125.82.49]) by groupstudy.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with
>> B ESMTP id oBKHEFIt023719 GroupStudy Mailer; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:14:16
>> B -0500
>> Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so3150026wwb.30 for
>> B <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:14:10 -0800 (PST)
>> Received: by 10.227.138.73 with SMTP id z9mr2846572wbt.97.1292865250122;
>> B Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:14:10 -0800 (PST)
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Received: by 10.227.148.5 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:13:48 -0800
>> B (PST)
>> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinQ4YX9t=-_iXMKDgzTT5SuDFXS=X=YTWfz32pg_at_mail.gmail.com>
>> References: <AANLkTinQ4YX9t=-_iXMKDgzTT5SuDFXS=X=YTWfz32pg_at_mail.gmail.com>
>> From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
>> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:13:48 +0000
>> Message-ID: <AANLkTinCEyeE8YEUBVqMNhatoqkK0n2kdJrTB3OboRdn_at_mail.gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: MDT
>> To: Aamir Aziz <aamiraz77_at_gmail.com>
>> Cc: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> Try running "show derived-config interface tunnel0". Tunnels that are
>> created are not static in nature and are therefore not present in the
>> "running-configuration". You can still see how they were dynamically
>> configured using the command above.
>>
>> Tunnels are multipoint GRE and have the destination address of the MDT
>> default group. Each PE interested in receiving traffic for that group
>> will join the group - that's how they attract the traffic and make
>> tunnels come up.
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture
>>
>> Mailto: markom_at_ipexpert.com
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:43, Aamir Aziz <aamiraz77_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear *,
>>>
>>> I have a basic question about MDT. So when we issue the command on a
>>> PE mdt default x.x.x.x under ip vrf the routers creates a tunnel based
>>> on lo0 and tunnel comes up. On the other end PE the same thing happen
>>> and multicast (vrf) traffic goes via this tunnel. The question is when
>>> i do sh run tunnel 0 i dont see any configuration so how did the
>>> tunnel come up and how does the router know how to reach the other
>>> end?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aamir
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net