Re: MPLS Problem

Hey buddy if i change my loopback to /32 on R1 and R3 it is working
perfectly
Can anyone exactly tell me what is the \32 of loopback do with MPLS

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:17 PM, srinivas pv <vsrinivas.paturi_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Which prefix you are pinging from R4?
> For this prefix, could you provide following output?
>
> On R1: show ip cef vrf <VRF name> <prefix> detail
> On R3: show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf <VRF name> <prefix> detail
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:47 PM, HEMANTH RAJ <hemanthrj_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey This is my topoogy
>>
>>
>> R1--------------------------R2-----------------------------R3
>> | |
>> | |
>> | |
>> R4 R5
>>
>>
>> R1 an R3 is my PE and R4 and R5 are my customers I am forming MPBGP
>> between
>> R1 and R3 and all routes are exchanged between R4 and R5
>> and all my imports r working fine
>> but i am getting this following error
>>
>> %BGP-4-VPNV4NH_MASK: Nexthop 3.3.3.3 may not be reachable from neigbor
>> 1.1.1.1 -^ not /32 mask
>>
>> but all my ldp neighbourships are up
>> and i had done sh ip mpls ldp discovery det
>> everythin is fine i can able to ping my transport address
>> All the routes of R5 are in R4 and R1 routing table
>>
>> but R4 cannot ping R4 and also R1 cannot ping R5
>>
>> Pls anyone help
>>
>>
>> --
>> Problems arise because we talk,problems are not solved because we don't
>> talk
>> So good or bad talk to your affectionate one's freely.
>>
>> Yours Friendly,
>> HP HEMANTH RAJ
>> Cisco Systems Inc.
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Problems arise because we talk,problems are not solved because we don't talk
So good or bad talk to your affectionate one's freely.
Yours Friendly,
HP HEMANTH RAJ
Cisco Systems Inc.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net