Typically it means you have an inconsistency between the port and the
port-channel. Do a show run on both and see if you are excluding different
VLAN's or missing configuration on the port.
Regards,
Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
Managing Partner / Sr. Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: tscott_at_ipexpert.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
garry baker
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 11:25 AM
To: hopalong
Cc: groupstudy
Subject: Re: I stand-alone
what the confis on both sides of the etherchannnel?
i have seen s - suspended many times, but do not know what causes the I -
standalone
very interesting...
-- Garry L. Baker "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:55 AM, hopalong <ccieangel2_at_googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I have a port-channel where one of the links is marked :- > > 'I stand-alone'* * > ** > #sho ether sum > Flags: D - down P - in port-channel > I - stand-alone s - suspended > H - Hot-standby (LACP only) > R - Layer3 S - Layer2 > U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator > u - unsuitable for bundling > w - waiting to be aggregated > d - default port > > Number of channel-groups in use: 6 > Number of aggregators: 6 > Group Port-channel Protocol Ports > ------+-------------+-----------+------------------------------ > 1 Po1(SU) PAgP Gi1/0/49(P) Gi1/0/51(P) > 2 Po2(SU) - Gi2/0/49(P) Gi2/0/51(P) > 3 Po3(SD) - > 4 Po4(SD) - > 5 Po5(SD) - > 15 Po15(SU) PAgP Gi2/0/50(I) Gi2/0/52(P) > > Can some one explain how Po15 is working in as much as how it is different > to Po1? > > Thanks! > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Mon Dec 06 2010 - 11:45:43 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 01 2011 - 09:37:49 ART