Re: I – stand-alone

From: garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:24:36 -0600

what the confis on both sides of the etherchannnel?

i have seen s - suspended many times, but do not know what causes the I -
standalone

very interesting...

--
Garry L. Baker
"There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:55 AM, hopalong <ccieangel2_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a port-channel where one of the links is marked :-
>
> 'I   stand-alone'* *
> **
> #sho ether sum
> Flags:  D - down        P - in port-channel
>        I - stand-alone s - suspended
>        H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
>        R - Layer3      S - Layer2
>        U - in use      f - failed to allocate aggregator
>        u - unsuitable for bundling
>        w - waiting to be aggregated
>        d - default port
>
> Number of channel-groups in use: 6
> Number of aggregators:           6
> Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports
> ------+-------------+-----------+------------------------------
> 1      Po1(SU)         PAgP      Gi1/0/49(P) Gi1/0/51(P)
> 2      Po2(SU)          -        Gi2/0/49(P) Gi2/0/51(P)
> 3      Po3(SD)          -
> 4      Po4(SD)          -
> 5      Po5(SD)          -
> 15     Po15(SU)        PAgP      Gi2/0/50(I) Gi2/0/52(P)
>
> Can some one explain how Po15 is working in as much as how it is different
> to Po1?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Dec 06 2010 - 10:24:36 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jan 01 2011 - 09:37:49 ART