Re: EoMPLS

From: Gaurav Thukral <pearlgaurav_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 06:40:53 +0530

Hi David,

Thanks for quick Reply ,

I will test it and let u know.

Regards,
Gaurav

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:55 AM, David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com> wrote:

> Port mode so that you can connect a dot1q trunk to the PE. Then you could
> add or remove vlan's without SP involvement. Using vlan mode/sub-interfaces
> will require that the SP add any new vlan's required, and would be two
> separate EoMPLS sessions.
>
> David
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Gaurav Thukral
> > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2010 8:11 PM
> > To: Group study; Wayne Lawson
> > Subject: EoMPLS
> >
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I have the following topology for EoMPLS.
> >
> > I have SVI 12 and SVI 13 on both the switches . I want to communicate
> > both
> > SVI.
> >
> > Which mode i will use to communicate PORT MODE or VLAN MODE.
> >
> > What will be configuration of both?
> >
> >
> > Sw1(CE)---------------R1(PE)------------------R2(PE)------------------
> > SW2(CE)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gaurav
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Nov 06 2010 - 06:40:53 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Dec 05 2010 - 22:14:55 ART