RE: Dynagen/dynamip simulation not working

Send me you .net and i will take a look. 64 Mb is enough to run 12.0S:

  image = g:\_CCIE\Emulator\Dynamips\images\c7200-p.120-32.S9.bin
  ram = 64
  npe = npe-400
  idlepc = 0x60669380

Regards,

Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S/SP)
amsoares_at_netcabo.pt

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ccieyarub
Sent: segunda-feira, 1 de Novembro de 2010 15:41
To: Jason Boyers
Cc: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Dynagen/dynamip simulation not working

Hi all

I'm trying to run a simulation from ccie ISP trainning site ospf LSA
example in
Www.Ccie18473.net/dynamips
This is a simulation of 6 routers c7200 and when I start all routers
with the ram=64 megs as mentioned in the .net file , all the routers
came up without any problem, but when I try to telnet to any of the
six routers , the telnet to the console of this router will stop in
the first message
" connected to dynamip VM R1 (ID 5, type 7200) - Console port.
So all the routers did not continue their booting and I can not access
the CLI of any router

- now I tried simpler simulation with only 2 routers but ram=64 and
still the console is frozen with the same message as above
- if I changed ram=256 with 2 routers things works fine
I don't have this problem when I m running the simulation with 2
routers and with ram=128
Sent from my iPhone

On 2010-11-01, at 10:58 AM, "Jason Boyers" <jboyers_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:

> I guess the question is this: what function are you looking for? Each
> vendor has their own strengths and weaknesses (though I prefer
> Cisco!) If
> you explain what you are trying to do, then we can provide a better
> response.
>
> Jason Boyers - CCIE #26024 (Wireless)
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Mailto: jboyers_at_ipexpert.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> Anthony Faria
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:52 AM
> To: Bilal Hansrod
> Cc: Hussam EL Kebbi; <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: Which vendor is equivalant to Cisco WLC 4404?
>
> I wouldn't say head to head. It is cheaper but you get what you pay
> for.
>
> Tony
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Bilal Hansrod
> <bilal.hansrod_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Aruba is head to head with Cisco in enterprise wireless solution,
> offcourse
>> cheaper.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Bilal Hansrod
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>>
>> On 01/11/2010, at 5:48 PM, Hussam EL Kebbi <hussamkibbi_at_hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Experts,
>>>
>>> What equipment can do same function as Cisco WLC?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
 

>>>
>>
>>
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
 

>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
 

> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
 

> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Nov 01 2010 - 16:23:58 ART