Re: Dynagen/dynamip simulation not working

Thanks Paul
- how about mac os x how much gig of ram it's using by default
- is there any recomended router type that I can run that won't eat
that much of memory
- is there any tweeking I could do to increase performance like
increasing virtual memory..etc
Cheers
Bert

Sent from my iPhone

On 2010-11-01, at 11:53 AM, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Just a reminder...
>
> If you are not running 64 bit, the distribution is limited to 1.5
> Gig per
> instance for windows and 3 Gig per instance on Linux or Unix. You
> should
> always provide enough RAM that the image requires. It may work with
> less in
> some circumstances but I would not roll the dice on that one.
>
> Paul
> --
> Paul Negron
> CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
> Senior Technical Instructor
> www.micronicstraining.com
>
>
>
>> From: Ccieyarub <ccieyarub_at_gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: Ccieyarub <ccieyarub_at_gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:46:21 -0400
>> To: Ccieyarub <ccieyarub_at_gmail.com>
>> Cc: Jason Boyers <jboyers_at_ipexpert.com>, "<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>"
>> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Subject: Re: Dynagen/dynamip simulation not working
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I'm trying to run a simulation from ccie ISP trainning site ospf LSA
>> example in
>> Www.Ccie18473.net/dynamips
>> This is a simulation of 6 routers c7200 and when I start all routers
>> with the ram=64 megs as mentioned in the .net file , all the routers
>> came up without any problem, but when I try to telnet to any of the
>> six routers , the telnet to the console of this router will stop in
>> the first message
>> " connected to dynamip VM R1 (ID 5, type 7200) - Console port.
>> So all the routers did not continue their booting and I can not
>> access
>> the CLI of any router
>>
>> - now I tried simpler simulation with only 2 routers but ram=64 and
>> still the console is frozen with the same message as above
>> - if I changed ram=256 with 2 routers things works fine
>> If I have ram=256 with 6 routers I'm getting an error from dynamip on
>> the third router loading Exception violation STATUS ACCESS VIOLATION
>> and all tge simulation will stop completely
>> I have Four gig ram dual core in xp which I was told lots of ram
>>
>> Thanks so much
>> Bert
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2010-11-01, at 11:41 AM, Ccieyarub <ccieyarub_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I'm trying to run a simulation from ccie ISP trainning site ospf LSA
>>> example in
>>> Www.Ccie18473.net/dynamips
>>> This is a simulation of 6 routers c7200 and when I start all routers
>>> with the ram=64 megs as mentioned in the .net file , all the routers
>>> came up without any problem, but when I try to telnet to any of
>>> the six routers , the telnet to the console of this router will stop
>>> in the first message
>>> " connected to dynamip VM R1 (ID 5, type 7200) - Console port.
>>> So all the routers did not continue their booting and I can not
>>> access the CLI of any router
>>>
>>> - now I tried simpler simulation with only 2 routers but ram=64 and
>>> still the console is frozen with the same message as above
>>> - if I changed ram=256 with 2 routers things works fine
>>> I don't have this problem when I m running the simulation with 2
>>> routers and with ram=128
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 2010-11-01, at 10:58 AM, "Jason Boyers" <jboyers_at_ipexpert.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I guess the question is this: what function are you looking for?
>>>> Each
>>>> vendor has their own strengths and weaknesses (though I prefer
>>>> Cisco!) If
>>>> you explain what you are trying to do, then we can provide a better
>>>> response.
>>>>
>>>> Jason Boyers - CCIE #26024 (Wireless)
>>>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>>> Mailto: jboyers_at_ipexpert.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>>>> Behalf Of
>>>> Anthony Faria
>>>> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:52 AM
>>>> To: Bilal Hansrod
>>>> Cc: Hussam EL Kebbi; <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: Which vendor is equivalant to Cisco WLC 4404?
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't say head to head. It is cheaper but you get what you pay
>>>> for.
>>>>
>>>> Tony
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Bilal Hansrod
>>>> <bilal.hansrod_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Aruba is head to head with Cisco in enterprise wireless solution,
>>>> offcourse
>>>>> cheaper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>> Bilal Hansrod
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/11/2010, at 5:48 PM, Hussam EL Kebbi <hussamkibbi_at_hotmail.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Experts,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What equipment can do same function as Cisco WLC?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
 

>>
>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
 

>>
>>
>>>
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
 

>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
 

>>
>>
>>>
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
 

>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Nov 01 2010 - 12:11:07 ART