Re: Shaping, policing and minimum bandwidth guatantee

They do not mention that directly...the article is explaining differences
between shaping and policing in general.

On 28 October 2010 12:27, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I have not read the doc yet but could they be referencing to CBWFQ?
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello experts,
>> I am reading the following Cisco document "Comparing Traffic Policing and
>> Traffic Shaping for Bandwidth Limiting"
>> (
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a3a25.shtml
>> )
>>
>> Can someone please explain their sentence: "neither mechanism provides a
>> minimum bandwidth guarantee during periods of congestion"
>>
>> I am confused as I believed that there are commands that do just that, for
>> example:
>>
>> In legacy configuration:
>> # map-class frame-relay XXX
>> # frame MINCIR 8000 <--------------------
>>
>> In MQC:
>> # policy-map XXX
>> # class class-default
>> # shape ADAPTIVE 8000 <--------------------
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> www.MicronicsTraining.com
> Sr. Technical Instructor
> YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
> Training And Remote Racks available

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 28 2010 - 17:49:16 ART