Re: Shaping, policing and minimum bandwidth guatantee

From: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:27:26 -0700

I have not read the doc yet but could they be referencing to CBWFQ?

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello experts,
> I am reading the following Cisco document "Comparing Traffic Policing and
> Traffic Shaping for Bandwidth Limiting"
> (
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a00800a3a25.shtml
> )
>
> Can someone please explain their sentence: "neither mechanism provides a
> minimum bandwidth guarantee during periods of congestion"
>
> I am confused as I believed that there are commands that do just that, for
> example:
>
> In legacy configuration:
> # map-class frame-relay XXX
> # frame MINCIR 8000 <--------------------
>
> In MQC:
> # policy-map XXX
> # class class-default
> # shape ADAPTIVE 8000 <--------------------
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
Training And Remote Racks available
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 28 2010 - 09:27:26 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:06 ART