Duplex configuration into the lab

Spam detection software, running on the system "groupstudy.com", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
admin_at_groupstudy.com for details.

Content preview: Dear Experts, I have a small question about the best approach
   into the lab. For duplex configuration on ethernet ports, is best practice
   set switches and router ports staticly to full-duplex or both sides to auto
   negociate? I supose than the mode is not explicit specified? I focus on both,
   TS and config sections for R&S. [...]

Content analysis details: (6.5 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 4.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
                [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?98.138.90.88>]
 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail
                            (paologoliviera[at]yahoo.com.br)
 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                            CUSTOM_MED
 1.5 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.4986]
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list
Received: from nm25.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
  (nm25.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.88]) by groupstudy.com
  (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id o9EAYDFN002852 GroupStudy
  Mailer; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:34:14 -0400
Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm25.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with
  NNFMP; 14 Oct 2010 10:34:08 -0000
Received: from [98.138.88.234] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with
  NNFMP; 14 Oct 2010 10:34:08 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1034.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14
  Oct 2010 10:34:07 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 901757.57908.bm_at_omp1034.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 73277 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Oct 2010 10:34:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com.br;
  s=s1024; t=1287052440;
  bh=SOAVav2OACp7Sjc6Lz1HhJ4m5PV6kdjjM1ijeIgZwbM=;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=BXcxJA+UUgs/n4PhNkpcqdTEJLZd80kuAg0gy/9KM2gzxTC+e1Mu8FLAH5eX0pjsSuaS5TBml3gzwjvvjr3V6ashoXT1jrulnkTlp/k/+hzbauEnQUVJGeLENrzJVADp4Xu8ACmyao9aeS0A+PsAor8tobszIq3nMrtTf0obdyY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024;
  d=yahoo.com.br;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=0iGYfTFbNOkdVx0j+QQpY0244EPPakfWv4HPH/7PieAXFRnSCekT7c37trCG5YgPU4hahzSrHTEJtRpY4e5o3o4GwxjmwD+jsMvROnNGXyGW7iYHAcQpS3Fk42NtcCpZtbwoMpvb1yaJ/HpAQqH7MW6ppoWOiWeBQpssQ7H6Ibc=;
Message-ID: <631488.66097.qm_at_web120606.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: swE5I7sVM1lJfsasv5I1P00wBkUvl4RD2fiPVFAnRI6YPNl
  9u3nwekAPGvGrQdynuB7Whv9ONKJoEoOETjp4xaq2ix8fC9uEvwK8mFc8zdk
  w2IV6r4iOycmGmGc2PVtWQEZn74IOo9IhDR069h93tj5teYLRVWNkLYEvC3i
  A9vshM3bDoWaX3boOGmS4z3T.mkJFOqzQjH3PHg--
Received: from [189.122.228.48] by web120606.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via
  HTTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 03:34:00 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/504.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.106.282862
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 03:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paolo Gomes oliveira <paologoliviera_at_yahoo.com.br>
Subject: Duplex configuration into the lab
To: Group Study <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by groupstudy.com id
  o9EAYDFN002852

Dear Experts,

I have a small question about the best approach into the lab.
For duplex configuration on ethernet ports, is best practice set switches and
router ports staticly to full-duplex or both sides to auto negociate?
I supose than the mode is not explicit specified?
I focus on both, TS and config sections for R&S.

Thanks for share your knowledge.

Paolo.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 14 2010 - 03:34:00 ART