Re: Route Tagging with Default Route

Bob, I think you are right, I was wondering myself if the refresh was
linked to the issue.

On 7 October 2010 15:39, Bob Sinclair <bob_at_bobsinclair.net> wrote:
> Hi Muzammil,
>
> I tried with "default-information originate route-map tag" And the tag
> sticks.
>
> Here is my theory:
>
> The trigger for the tag withdrawal seems to be the default refresh,
> indicated by this output from debug ip routing: " RT: NET-RED 0.0.0.0/0"
>
> With default-information originate, this refresh did not cause a withdrawal
> of the tag. Perhaps the refresh causes RIP to see the redistributed route
> as internal, and it is resent as a new route, without the tag?
>
>
>
> Bob Sinclair CCIE 10427 CCSI 30427
> CIERS2 Online Instructor
> www.tinyurl.com/ciers2online
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Muzammil Malick
>> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 10:30 AM
>> To: garry baker
>> Cc: Cisco certification
>> Subject: Re: Route Tagging with Default Route
>>
>> Bob, that is very interesting, because it is probably exactly what I
>> am seeing, I just never saw the early debug that shows the tag being
>> added and then removed later.
>>
>> Gary, myself and Bob are able to get at least some routes tagged, it
>> is the default that is the problem.
>>
>> My config is as follows:
>>
>>
>> route-map OSPF2RIP permit 10
>> set tag 110
>>
>> router rip
>> redistribute ospf 1 metric 5 route-map OSPF2RIP
>>
>> I don't have the complete config because im at work at the moment.
>>
>> On 7 October 2010 15:20, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > yeah i miss read that...i thought you were going the other way...
>> >
>> > i tried this with a simple 3 router setup R1 <-> R2 <-> R3
>> >
>> > and i cannot get any tags on the OSPF2RIP routes when i redistribute
>> with
>> > the route-map
>> >
>> > but the other way RIP2OSPF works like a charm with the tag keyword in
>> ospf
>> >
>> > i am using Version 12.4(15)T14 on GNS3 for my lab
>> >
>> > what does your config look like?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Garry L. Baker
>> >
>> > "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Gary, not sure if I understand?
>> >>
>> >> the route is originated in OSPF using default-information-originate,
>> >> but the routes are not being tagged when they are redistributed into
>> >> RIP. Did you get this the wrong way round below or am I
>> >> misunderstanding you?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 7 October 2010 14:50, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > if the route is originated by OSPF, then it will not be 'tagged'
>> as RIP
>> >> > routes are sent into OSPF...
>> >> >
>> >> > is there a way to make the default a RIP route and see if the tag
>> shows
>> >> > up
>> >> > after redistribution?
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Garry L. Baker
>> >> >
>> >> > "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Muzammil Malick
>> <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Guys
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hope someone can help me out.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I am redistributing routes into RIP from OSPF. I have a route-map
>> that
>> >> >> sets a tag on the routes as they are redistributed into RIP.
>> >> >> The problem is that all the routes seem to be tagged apart from
>> the
>> >> >> default route. The default route which is originated in OSPF
>> always
>> >> >> seems to have a tag of "0" when I debug RIP updates, however all
>> the
>> >> >> other routes have the correct tag of "110"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Any ideas?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3182 - Release Date:
>> 10/07/10 02:34:00

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 07 2010 - 15:53:51 ART