Hi Muzammil,
I tried with "default-information originate route-map tag" And the tag
sticks.
Here is my theory:
The trigger for the tag withdrawal seems to be the default refresh,
indicated by this output from debug ip routing: " RT: NET-RED 0.0.0.0/0"
With default-information originate, this refresh did not cause a withdrawal
of the tag. Perhaps the refresh causes RIP to see the redistributed route
as internal, and it is resent as a new route, without the tag?
Bob Sinclair CCIE 10427 CCSI 30427
CIERS2 Online Instructor
www.tinyurl.com/ciers2online
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Muzammil Malick
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 10:30 AM
> To: garry baker
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Route Tagging with Default Route
>
> Bob, that is very interesting, because it is probably exactly what I
> am seeing, I just never saw the early debug that shows the tag being
> added and then removed later.
>
> Gary, myself and Bob are able to get at least some routes tagged, it
> is the default that is the problem.
>
> My config is as follows:
>
>
> route-map OSPF2RIP permit 10
> set tag 110
>
> router rip
> redistribute ospf 1 metric 5 route-map OSPF2RIP
>
> I don't have the complete config because im at work at the moment.
>
> On 7 October 2010 15:20, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > yeah i miss read that...i thought you were going the other way...
> >
> > i tried this with a simple 3 router setup R1 <-> R2 <-> R3
> >
> > and i cannot get any tags on the OSPF2RIP routes when i redistribute
> with
> > the route-map
> >
> > but the other way RIP2OSPF works like a charm with the tag keyword in
> ospf
> >
> > i am using Version 12.4(15)T14 on GNS3 for my lab
> >
> > what does your config look like?
> >
> > --
> > Garry L. Baker
> >
> > "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Muzammil Malick <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Gary, not sure if I understand?
> >>
> >> the route is originated in OSPF using default-information-originate,
> >> but the routes are not being tagged when they are redistributed into
> >> RIP. Did you get this the wrong way round below or am I
> >> misunderstanding you?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7 October 2010 14:50, garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > if the route is originated by OSPF, then it will not be 'tagged'
> as RIP
> >> > routes are sent into OSPF...
> >> >
> >> > is there a way to make the default a RIP route and see if the tag
> shows
> >> > up
> >> > after redistribution?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Garry L. Baker
> >> >
> >> > "There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Muzammil Malick
> <malickmuz_at_gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Guys
> >> >>
> >> >> Hope someone can help me out.
> >> >>
> >> >> I am redistributing routes into RIP from OSPF. I have a route-map
> that
> >> >> sets a tag on the routes as they are redistributed into RIP.
> >> >> The problem is that all the routes seem to be tagged apart from
> the
> >> >> default route. The default route which is originated in OSPF
> always
> >> >> seems to have a tag of "0" when I debug RIP updates, however all
> the
> >> >> other routes have the correct tag of "110"
> >> >>
> >> >> Any ideas?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >>
> >> >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.862 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3182 - Release Date:
> 10/07/10 02:34:00
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 07 2010 - 10:39:31 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 01 2010 - 06:42:05 ART