It may be dynamips itself, I had the same problem, left the server running
for a few hours and when I came back it was.working.
On Sep 23, 2010 7:01 AM, "Abdul" <rslab007_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
> I hate writing such generic questions, but I am stumped on this one. I am
> trying to bring up an IPv4 PE-to-PE relationship on two 2691s running as
> PEs. My lab is a simply setup where I have two routers in a box
> (r3--r6--r5--r4--r3) where I am running OSPF as my IGP. LDP is the label
> swaping protocol and I have full reachability between all routers. The
> IPV4 iBGP setup is between routers r3 and r4. When I do the generic iBGP
> peering, they come right up. However, when I attempt to activate the peer
> relationship under th address family, first off I don't see the BGP
peering
> up (under show ip bgp vpnv4 sum) on either side.
>
> I've combed over the configs and made sure my route-targets are the same
(on
> both sides), the ldp is up (yes) that rechability between the two
loopbacks
> exist (yes, under the igp between all four routers), but I can't get the
BGP
> IPv4 relationship up. I can however, get a normal iBGP relationship up
> between the two routers (so reachability is not an issue). Its just when I
> attempt to activate it under the address family and look for the
> relationship between the two routers that I don't see it.
>
> I could throw up configs (so that everybody sees it), but I was wondering
is
> anyone has seen this issue before. I am running this setup purely on
> dynamips, and the simulated routers are two 2691s running Advanced
> Enterprises IOS 12.4(15)T13.
>
> Would appreciate is anyone has seen this issue and could give me a hint
into
> my problem.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Sep 23 2010 - 07:22:12 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:05 ART