Re: OT: Switch up time...4 years!

From: Syed Moazzam Daimi <daimi.moazzam_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:20:07 +0800

Seems like Like Cisco Marketting Team can use this email chain to help
increase there sell and a feedback for Cisco Product Managers so that they
can yell on developers not to make so stable products.

Just Kidding..;)

Recently I finished a project in Texas where I saw almost all devices (150+
devices including 6500,4500 and others routers and switches) up and running
for more than 3 years.

Bravo Cisco !!!

Syed Moazzam Daimi
CCIE # 22100

On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:34 PM, GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> 11 yrs is very very impressive ..
>
> Hammer ,
> How would you rank the ISRs ( 28xx , 38xx ) .. I find them solid as well :)
>
> Gaurav Madan
> CCIE # 23863
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:38 AM, --Hammer-- <bhmccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > 11 years is pretty impressive. The kicker is that back then (11.x) the
> IOS
> > was solid enough to support those kinds of uptimes. I don't have a single
> > piece of Cisco gear that doesn't have a bug or two that has warranted an
> > upgrade. The farther you get from the traditional routing and switching
> > gear, the worse it gets. My 7206s are pretty solid. Running OSPF/BGP/etc.
> >
> > FWSMs - a few bugs and vulnerabilities
> > ACEs - Bleh. Storm-O-bugs
> > WAAS - Bleh. Storm-O-bugs
> > ASAs - a few bugs
> > 6509s - bugs
> > 3560s/3750s/4948s - pretty solid
> > 7207s - pretty solid
> >
> > I miss the good old days.....
> >
> > --Hammer--
> >
> >
> > On 9/18/2010 4:06 PM, Robert Hosford wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't see code that old because the Y2K. But when you're a switch does
> >> it matter?
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Robert Hosford
> >> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 3:14 PM
> >> To: Gary Duncanson; Martin Hogan
> >> Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >> Subject: RE: OT: Switch up time...4 years!
> >>
> >> A 3.12 server no doubt. A switch up that long and never patched I bet.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Gary Duncanson
> >> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 3:04 PM
> >> To: Martin Hogan
> >> Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >> Subject: Re: OT: Switch up time...4 years!
> >>
> >> Beaten by a Novell server somewhere no doubt. Still impressive though!
> >>
> >> Gary CNE
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Martin Hogan"<martin.john.hogan_at_gmail.com>
> >> To:<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 10:33 AM
> >> Subject: Re: OT: Switch up time...4 years!
> >>
> >>
> >>> Without intentionally being a "topper" - here is one a colleague found
> >>> recently:
> >>>
> >>> XXXXXXXXXXX#show ver
> >>> Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
> >>> IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-IS-L), Version 11.2(14), RELEASE SOFTWARE
> >>> (fc1)
> >>> Copyright (c) 1986-1998 by cisco Systems, Inc.
> >>> Compiled Mon 18-May-98 12:43 by tlane
> >>> Image text-base: 0x0302F4E4, data-base: 0x00001000
> >>> ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 5.2(5), RELEASE SOFTWARE
> >>> BOOTFLASH: 3000 Bootstrap Software (IGS-RXBOOT), Version 10.2(5),
> RELEASE
> >>> SOFTWARE (fc1)
> >>> XXXXXXXXX uptime is *11 years, 1 week, 4 days, 3 hours, 50 minutes
> >>> *System restarted by power-on at 12:06:58 UTC Mon Jul 12 1999
> >>> System image file is "flash:c2500-is-l_112-14.bin", booted via flash
> >>> cisco 2500 (68030) processor (revision L) with 2048K/2048K bytes of
> >>> memory.
> >>> Processor board ID 01880349, with hardware revision 00000000
> >>> Bridging software.
> >>> X.25 software, Version 2.0, NET2, BFE and GOSIP compliant.
> >>> 2 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
> >>> 2 Serial network interface(s)
> >>> 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
> >>> 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read ONLY)
> >>> Configuration register is 0x2102
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It was a good effort.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Dale Shaw<dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Brad Ellis<brad_at_ccbootcamp.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> C3548XL-COLO-INET uptime is 4 years, 30 weeks, 4 days, 2 hours, 12
> >>>>>> minutes
> >>>>>> System returned to ROM by reload
> >>>>>> System restarted at 17:43:37 PST Thu Feb 16 2006
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:58 PM, GAURAV MADAN<
> gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thats the quality Cisco delivers !
> >>>>
> >>>> Hmm.. 3500XL. it's probably more that the operators are afraid to type
> >>>> any commands into it, in case it decides to do something weird and
> >>>> unexplainable, requiring a reload. That's probably what happened last
> >>>> time.
> >>>>
> >>>> :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> cheers,
> >>>> Dale
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>
> >>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Syed Moazzam Daimi
CCIE # 22100
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Sep 20 2010 - 13:20:07 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:05 ART