yep that's it. I was sleeping at the wheel on that one.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Shine Joseph <shinejoseph_at_dodo.com.au>wrote:
> Priority and bandwidth values are in 'Kbps', whereas shape is in 'bps'.
> You have allocated 64Kbps for the total traffic in the SHAPE and trying to
> limit 32,000 Kbps as Priority or Bandwidth.
>
> HTH,
> Shine
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Aundra (Andre) Browning" <aundra.browning_at_earthlink.net>
> Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 10:29 PM
> To: "Ladee Geek" <ladeegeek_at_gmail.com>
> Cc: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Re: QoS - faste with 32k priority and shaped to 64k getting "not
> enough BW error"
>
>
> Looks like you are setting up your LLQ with 32Mb and trying to shape to
>> 64kbps. Not in front of a machine to check but I think your values look
>> wrong.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Sep 18, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Ladee Geek <ladeegeek_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I got the insufficient BW error so I decided to put the bandwidth reserve
>>>
>> to
>>
>>> allow me to go above 75mbps. But I should have only needed to increase
>>> the
>>> BW reservation amount for the prioritiy queueing, not the shaping
>>> correct?
>>>
>>> So I don't know why I am getting the error.
>>>
>>>
>>> class-map match-all ip-prec
>>> match ip precedence 6
>>> !
>>> !
>>> policy-map child-qos
>>> class ip-prec
>>> priority 32000
>>> class class-default
>>> fair-queue 512
>>> policy-map parent-qos
>>> class class-default
>>> shape average 64000
>>> service-policy child-qos
>>>
>>> R4(config-if)#do sr int fa 0/0
>>> Building configuration...
>>> Current configuration : 235 bytes
>>> !
>>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> description SW1 Fa0/4
>>> ip address 192.13.46.4 255.255.255.0
>>> duplex auto
>>> speed auto
>>> ipv6 address FE80::4 link-local
>>> ipv6 address FEC0::46:4/125
>>> ipv6 rip LAB7 enable
>>> !
>>> max-reserved-bandwidth 100
>>> !
>>> end
>>> R4(config-if)#int fa 0/0
>>> R4(config-if)#
>>> R4(config-if)#
>>> R4(config-if)#
>>> R4(config-if)#serv out parent-qos
>>> Insufficient bandwidth 64 kbps for bandwidth guarantee
>>> R4(config-if)#
>>> *Sep 18 21:35:48.382: Interface FastEthernet0/0 max_reserved_bandwidth
>>> config will not
>>> take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So I changed the priority to bandwidth in the child policy and got the
>>> same
>>> error
>>>
>>> R4(config)#no policy-map child-qos
>>> R4(config)#policy-map child-qos
>>> R4(config-pmap)# class ip-prec
>>> R4(config-pmap-c)# bandw 32000
>>> R4(config-pmap-c)# class class-default
>>> R4(config-pmap-c)# fair-queue 512
>>> R4(config-pmap-c)#int fa 0/0
>>> R4(config-if)#servic
>>> R4(config-if)#service-policy out parent-qos
>>> R4(config-if)#
>>> R4(config-if)#
>>> R4(config-if)#
>>> *Sep 18 21:39:40.150: Interface FastEthernet0/0 max_reserved_bandwidth
>>> config will not
>>> take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
>>> -
>>>
>>> R4(config-if)#do sr int fa0/0
>>> Building configuration...
>>> Current configuration : 269 bytes
>>> !
>>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>> description SW1 Fa0/4
>>> ip address 192.13.46.4 255.255.255.0
>>> duplex auto
>>> speed auto
>>> ipv6 address FE80::4 link-local
>>> ipv6 address FEC0::46:4/125
>>> ipv6 rip LAB7 enable
>>> !
>>> max-reserved-bandwidth 100
>>> service-policy output parent-qos
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> r/
>>> LG
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-- r/ LG Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Sep 19 2010 - 19:30:47 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:05 ART