Re: QoS - faste with 32k priority and shaped to 64k getting

Priority and bandwidth values are in 'Kbps', whereas shape is in 'bps'.
You have allocated 64Kbps for the total traffic in the SHAPE and trying to
limit 32,000 Kbps as Priority or Bandwidth.

HTH,
Shine

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Aundra (Andre) Browning" <aundra.browning_at_earthlink.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 10:29 PM
To: "Ladee Geek" <ladeegeek_at_gmail.com>
Cc: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: QoS - faste with 32k priority and shaped to 64k getting "not
enough BW error"

> Looks like you are setting up your LLQ with 32Mb and trying to shape to
> 64kbps. Not in front of a machine to check but I think your values look
> wrong.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 18, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Ladee Geek <ladeegeek_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I got the insufficient BW error so I decided to put the bandwidth reserve
> to
>> allow me to go above 75mbps. But I should have only needed to increase
>> the
>> BW reservation amount for the prioritiy queueing, not the shaping
>> correct?
>>
>> So I don't know why I am getting the error.
>>
>>
>> class-map match-all ip-prec
>> match ip precedence 6
>> !
>> !
>> policy-map child-qos
>> class ip-prec
>> priority 32000
>> class class-default
>> fair-queue 512
>> policy-map parent-qos
>> class class-default
>> shape average 64000
>> service-policy child-qos
>>
>> R4(config-if)#do sr int fa 0/0
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 235 bytes
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>> description SW1 Fa0/4
>> ip address 192.13.46.4 255.255.255.0
>> duplex auto
>> speed auto
>> ipv6 address FE80::4 link-local
>> ipv6 address FEC0::46:4/125
>> ipv6 rip LAB7 enable
>> !
>> max-reserved-bandwidth 100
>> !
>> end
>> R4(config-if)#int fa 0/0
>> R4(config-if)#
>> R4(config-if)#
>> R4(config-if)#
>> R4(config-if)#serv out parent-qos
>> Insufficient bandwidth 64 kbps for bandwidth guarantee
>> R4(config-if)#
>> *Sep 18 21:35:48.382: Interface FastEthernet0/0 max_reserved_bandwidth
>> config will not
>> take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
>>
>>
>>
>> So I changed the priority to bandwidth in the child policy and got the
>> same
>> error
>>
>> R4(config)#no policy-map child-qos
>> R4(config)#policy-map child-qos
>> R4(config-pmap)# class ip-prec
>> R4(config-pmap-c)# bandw 32000
>> R4(config-pmap-c)# class class-default
>> R4(config-pmap-c)# fair-queue 512
>> R4(config-pmap-c)#int fa 0/0
>> R4(config-if)#servic
>> R4(config-if)#service-policy out parent-qos
>> R4(config-if)#
>> R4(config-if)#
>> R4(config-if)#
>> *Sep 18 21:39:40.150: Interface FastEthernet0/0 max_reserved_bandwidth
>> config will not
>> take effect on the queueing features configured via service-policy
>> -
>>
>> R4(config-if)#do sr int fa0/0
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 269 bytes
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>> description SW1 Fa0/4
>> ip address 192.13.46.4 255.255.255.0
>> duplex auto
>> speed auto
>> ipv6 address FE80::4 link-local
>> ipv6 address FEC0::46:4/125
>> ipv6 rip LAB7 enable
>> !
>> max-reserved-bandwidth 100
>> service-policy output parent-qos
>>
>>
>>
>> r/
>> LG
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Sep 20 2010 - 05:09:56 ART