Re: FAX OVER IP ! anyone ???

I still don't get why OpenText doesn't have their own free T.38 driver but
instead sell a BrookTrout SR140 which has channel licenses.

>>> I was scratching my head around this as well. Spoke with a folk who
works as a coder in C++ on CFS product, he said it's cheaper to get
ready-made. It's like take-away food (always cheaper than going to a
restaurant) :)

CFS Licensing is a lot better in v9 then previous releases. It was really
$h!t.

frog

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Jason Aarons (US) <
jason.aarons_at_us.didata.com> wrote:

> I've deployed both. I find the XMedius a little easier to deploy, however
> RightFax has Remote DocTransport servers which can be deployed remotely, not
> sure if XMedius has similar remote software board solution.
>
> The DocTransport can act indepdently to receive faxes in event of WAN
> failure. For example you put main servers in US with remote servers in Asia,
> Europe, Africa, etc.
>
> I still don't get why OpenText doesn't have their own free T.38 driver but
> instead sell a BrookTrout SR140 which has channel licenses.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> spycharlies
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 11:29 AM
> To: Nick Matthews
> Cc: Radioactive Frog; kaelwyoung_at_netscape.net; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: FAX OVER IP ! anyone ???
>
> Thanks Nick! Yea, i narrowed my solution to XMediusFAX Enterprise and
> RightFax 9.4 (Cisco Fax). Just currently looking at their Cons and Pro
> etc..and how well they integrate into CUCM, Microsoft UC.
>
> I also purchased the book you've referenced, it seems to be a good book on
> FoIP
>
> Cheers :)
>
> ~Charlie
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Nick Matthews <matthn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For book references, look no further than:
> > http://www.amazon.com/Fax-Modem-Text-IP-Telephony/dp/1587052695
> >
> > Great book.
> >
> > For fax servers, look at cisco fax server and xmedius.
> >
> > -nick
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Use Cisco Fax server. I have deployed about 3 of them for large
> >> corporates.
> >> make sure you buy fax to email and vice-versa models. The web module
> >> is the best for hetrogenous environment (mac/linux/windows shop).
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:09 AM, spycharlies <spycharlies_at_gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Good question Karl, Including my remote sites, i would say i am
> >> running
> >> > about 200 fax machines, CUCM 7, UCCX 6 ...for gateway, am currently
> >> using
> >> > 2911, VG224 and T1 to PSTN, no gatekeepers.....; the phones are
> >> > also running skinny...
> >> >
> >> > FOIPing within an IP network wouldnt be an issue i would imagine,
> >> > but terminating the fax at the other end of the analog fax device
> >> > is gonna
> >> be
> >> > very interesting, basically my ISP would have to be running
> >> > end-to-end
> >> SIP
> >> > tunnels or i wonder how that would work...
> >> >
> >> > Am also looking at posible fax servers, one that can handle minimum
> >> > of
> >> 20
> >> > simulteneous faxes at any given time..
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the book reference, i will definately check it out.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >
> >> > Charlie
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:30 PM, <kaelwyoung_at_netscape.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Charlie,
> >> > > How many fax stations do you intend to run ? What
> >> > > version
> >> of
> >> > > Call Manager UCCX are you running ? How many Voice gateways do
> >> > > you
> >> have ?
> >> > > What platforms are the Voice gateways running on? What version of
> >> > > the
> >> IOS
> >> > is
> >> > > currently running on the Gateways ? Do you have any gatekeepers
> >> > > in
> >> your
> >> > > Network ? Are you using SIP H323 or MGCP? Are there any remote
> >> > > sites
> >> that
> >> > > you will need fax services ?
> >> > > A good book would be
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-Voice-Gateways-Gatekeepers-Mallory/dp/158
> >> 705258X
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >
> Karl.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From: spycharlies <spycharlies_at_gmail.com>
> >> > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> >> > > Sent: Wed, Sep 1, 2010 3:47 pm
> >> > > Subject: FAX OVER IP ! anyone ???
> >> > >
> >> > > Hey guys,
> >> > >
> >> > > Is anyone currently running fax over IP ? My network is a Cisco
> >> > > house running full blown IP telephony.
> >> > >
> >> > > I am looking at implementing FOIP, and would appreciate any info
> >> > > from
> >> > those
> >> > > already running this technology on their organization;
> >> > >
> >> > > What books would you recommend that gives a detailed insight and
> >> > > configurations guide on this technology??
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >
> >> > > Charlie
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> _____________________________________________________________________
> >> __
> >> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >
> >> > ___________________________________________________________________
> >> > ____ Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _____________________________________________________________________
> >> __ Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Disclaimer:
>
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
> designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
> this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
> from your computer. Thank you.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Sep 14 2010 - 23:17:26 ART