No, it's not a common practice Jack or at least I haven't seen them from
providers. Maybe because its a manual process, although its a very good idea
to have LSA Flooding across super-backbone.
-- -- Sincerely, Shawn Zandi Network Architect and Consultant Cisco Certified CCIE x2 (R&S + Security) Juniper JNCIS x2 (ER & SEC) - Foundry/Brocade BCNE - Procurve Master ASE (MASE) Dubai Internet City web: http://www.shafagh.com blog: http://blog.shafagh.com email: shafagh_at_shafagh.com On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Jack Router <pan.router_at_gmail.com> wrote: > In my workbooks sham-links are presented as a way of tricking the router to > send traffic via MPLS cloud and not via the backup link, when OSPF is > redistributed via MBGP. > My question is: > On real networks, is it practical to configure sham links even if no backup > links are installed? The reason for this would be to avoid confusion with O > and IA routes, so routes originated in the same area are seen as internal > routes O and not inter-area IA. > > thx Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Wed Sep 08 2010 - 09:29:39 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Oct 01 2010 - 05:58:05 ART